Active fighter for the rights of smokers Dmitry Kosyrev says about the reliability of studies of risk of lung cancer for passive smokers.
If you smoke, you have a reason and a little drinking: once again it is proved by science that tobacco smoke is not harmful to others. It would be one medical study, it could attempt to challenge or ignore.
And here we see the processing and synthesis of 102 existing studies trying to prove any link between Smoking and lung cancer — not Smoking, and others. That is, the assessment of the entire existing body of scientific data. And the conclusion: if communication at all is what almost reverse, that is, those who are around smokers, healthier than others.
But since it does, well, nothing can not be, the conclusion of the researchers polite: the relationship between passive Smoking and the specified disease is not at all. Work on the 102 studies was conducted by Lee PN, Fry JS, Forey BA, Hamling JS, Thornton AJ — I give them in English in order to be able to enter names in the search.
As expected in science, long and unreadable. But it’s there. By the way, this team is 30 years worked for UN-tion, the International Agency for research on cancer (IARC) and advised the two sides of tobacco-anti-Smoking battle and pharmaceutical and tobacco companies. So to challenge their competence is useless. One of the tasks researchers (and statistics) has been monitoring all publications about “passive Smoking”, and in this case they spent “a correction of mistakes” in all these reports. That is, the reports simply to check and clean.
Statistics is a science. You can’t take 50 smokers 50 non-smokers, find one of the first, for example, scurvy and say that Smoking by 2% increases the risk of scurvy: ridicule. So, as a laugh generated by grants anti-tobacco forces “junk science” on that same subject, about the dangers of “passive Smoking”. To collect data, manipulate and handle them should be able to, this “lie group” and different.
© SPUTNIK/ VITALIY BELOUSOV Warsaw, nicotine and the responsibility lies
Briefly, they identified when smokers declared themselves non-smokers and this confused picture, and also made allowances for the other, obviously present in the research factors that can cause cancer (purely conditionally asbestos). By the way, trying to establish a connection between secondhand smoke and lung cancer gave a positive result only on studies for Asia, other parts of the world and without cleansing anything that is not shown (and it can’t be, people are people everywhere). Now, the question is removed. Anywhere not just in Asia did not know how to interview.
The main result of the work of the group Dr. Li: if earlier it was possible to speak about a 22% risk of lung cancer for passive smokers in enclosed spaces (open spaces, no one seriously, and did not think, except for the sick on the head of the activists), after work on the bugs 22% disappear. And where do they all come from? Someone really wanted to, they were…
© SPUTNIK/ PAVEL LISITSYN Nicotine, Warsaw, Himmler and Goebbels And moreover, that disappeared 22%. Turned out not only that no research shows any link between Smoking in the workplace and the incidence of cancer in non-smokers others — 27% of European research actually shows the opposite relationship.
The opposite is when a “passive smokers” are healthier Smoking. And it’s all about Holy (tobacco control activists). Science shows that children who grew up in a house where the parents smoke, the risk of lung cancer is 22% less. Yes, less. And then in the report there are all sorts of things — such as the fact that regular and steady passive Smoking means that you smoke 7-10 cigarettes a YEAR!! But without it everything is clear. © SPUTNIK/ ILYA PITALEV Why is he howling, or Lie Smoking the simplest conclusion from all this is that there is no passive Smoking.
It is a myth that was invented and actively proves, first of all, the Institute of tobacco control Department of the Reich Chancellery a Hitler, the most famous in the history of anti-Smoking. But did not proved. Now about the significance of the research of Dr. Lee. I remember one of the discussions I’m reminded of the now-classic interview with the most, perhaps, the distinguished physician of France, Philip Ewen, head of the research Institute Necker. (Link goes to English translation, and all references to this interview — a lot and everywhere I say, classic).
Ewen reminded that research on the connection of passive Smoking and cancer “about 100”, 40% of them say about the complete harmlessness of passive Smoking to health. The remaining 60% believe that cancer risk is higher by 0.02% for the optimistic and by 0.15% in the pessimistic forecasts. That is still no.
© SPUTNIK/ KIRILL KALLINIKOV Why she is howling, or there’s good news, I Reminded about this at the discussion — and got in response: well, I think, some French, and when was that — in 2010, you say? Well, during this time, the science has progressed Now… we see where she went. Iven was talking “in General”, being just familiar with the contradictory and contrary to logic and reason data. But now these data are analyzed all at once. And this is more serious. By the way, part the other, in addition to cancer, diseases — the same thing. Haven’t found anything.
© SPUTNIK/ VITALIY BELOUSOV Warsaw lessons: a dying anti-Smoking campaign What is interesting: the framework Convention of the world health organization, in accordance with which are taken all sorts of laws to limit Smoking, was developed long before 2010. These laws are not about reducing the harm of Smoking to smokers themselves, but protecting others from the harmful effects of smoke. But medicine at that time also knew that other people, not just doctors, building of a Convention on the fake. And now even more so know.
By the way, Iven in fact, this interview became famous because he said I’m retiring and so you can freely tell all, and I was not allowed to work. Let’s see how long it lasts falsifiers in an age when mass people sell in someone else’s commercial or political interests to expose the beginning of a landslide. The other day I wrote about this story in relation to mass treatment of brains to chose Hillary Clinton. With the harm of passive Smoking is the same, if not worse. The time has come when the lie collapses. Hold on to the chairs…
