Can’t stop the publication of the articles in the newspaper A. Kulishova “Talk about it” (“HORN” № 29, 2016) is dedicated to standardization of the breed Russian decoy, and the caustic criticism the article Vladimir Lobanov “Selection of the Russian decoy”. Criticism and carping words of the same root, but differ in meaning, and purpose statements.
On the whole page, Kuleshov ernichat for each stylistic and spelling nuance, sometimes substituting the form a different meaning. Sometimes, finding the text V. Lobanova’s not a good phrase or term, A. Kuleshov does not miss the moment to accuse the author of distorting the truth. Such carping satirical monologues Gennady Khazanov about the tongues of Viktor Chernomyrdin. But You, Kulishov, not the humorist-satirist, and competent expert-the engineer, as we saw at the first meeting of the round table, when listening to Your long speech on the question of the implementation of the Brussels standard of birds. Although, in my opinion, Your speech was also, he noted You were not interrupted and were not blamed. And that’s because gathered like — minded people, not indifferent to problems of breeding stool pigeons. Criticism (and it is impossible to find the optimal solution any more or less significant issue) should be constructive and friendly, free from ridiculing the shortcomings of others and non-offensive. Vladimir Lobanov is an experienced and qualified specialist in decoy ducks — deserve respect at least for what is one of the leading warriors for our common cause. In fact, we soldiers of the front. Opponents and detractors have a lot, so we must confront them clearly defined and legally sound proposals on improving hunting legislation. This is not easy in terms of disregard for authorities to hunt and hunting. This is partly due to the fact that the first persons of the state are not hunters, as it once was. Hunters were almost all crowned the Romanovs. And the rulers of our country after the revolution — from Lenin to Brezhnev — also was fond of hunting and improving hunting legislation. Let us recall the order of the President to the Prime Minister on the strengthening of the hunting management Department (on district — 2-3 staff), which is still not completed. In this situation, the members of the Working group formed at the meeting of the round table, must not fight with each other on the pages of kotisaari, and to develop (and here I agree with A. by Kulikovym) consolidated solutions and projects. For the upcoming year-end meeting of the club of the Working group will report on a specific work and its results.
