Let us assume that the US is fighting terrorists with more caution. Too radical to combat terrorism, States do not really want. Firstly because the USA are far away, in the second – US is profitable to sell them weapons.
USA is generally beneficial to sell weapons. Capitalism – to save everything. All the old – that the Americans are trying to profitably sell and make. There is no confrontation between Russia and the United States – here a purely “buy – sell”, and when setting to nakalimot the sale of weapons rises in price. Pragmatism.
It is necessary to consider one truth, that the capitalist world – are not entirely clear to the Socialist countries, hence the film – where “Bolivar” will not sustain two. Liberal there is one, he believes its pragmatic benefits, and everything else is secondary. And it’s such a morale among the EU and in the US, which is not perceived in the countries of the former USSR and many other countries in Asia( whose kinship support is very strong), like this our world. In the West, all morality is based on benefit, nothing can be redone. For Russia – it is immoral to kill relatives over the inheritance, and to the West is okay, the main thing that is not proven.
It is necessary to find a compromise with the West, between conscience and profit(these are two different moral). Don’t have to kill each other, of the fact – that different morality. It is necessary to study and find compromise solutions. This is the job of diplomats and politicians and psychologists.
