Liberal democracy is a system of social organization the main principles of which are: individual freedom, private property, rule of law, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, popular elections of government. Now all these principles are elevated to the ideal of life is to admit that the system is really good if you live in a slave-owning America or Europe in the age of commercials in the 17th.
But what could be wrong with this system?
First – unlimited social stratification. Rich or become even richer, or it may remain with his for a very long time.
Guglielmo Barone and Sauro, Mosetti, economists from main financial institutions in the Apennines – Bank of Italy, conducted an unusual study. They went in the archives of Florence, looked into the Florentine taxpayers in 1427 and compared them with the data of the Tax administration of Florence in 2011, the Results surprised the researchers: among the most wealthy taxpayers in the 15 and 21st centuries same as almost 900 names.
The study, of course, took a lot of time, but it was not so difficult due to the peculiarities of Italian surnames. On them without much difficulty to determine the place of birth of the person, and they almost do not change with the centuries”.
– The expert.<url>, http://expert.ru/2016/05/21/florentsiya/
The second is the possibility of coming to power, fascists and nationalists. The inability to resolve class contradictions pushes capitalists to the most extreme forms of bourgeois dictatorship, even on a blatant abuse of the workers to any means to keep society in status quo. Plus freedom of speech for all: the crazy, the perverts, Nazis, Imbeciles, and other “interesting” personalities.
Alternative released the word was formulated by the Russian classics about the author should be responsible and understand the consequences in society from his writings. But does anyone ever from the capitalists and their henchmen listened to such advice? Hitler or Mussolini did not see the consequences of what they are called in his writings? Knew and did it willingly, who for money, others for fame. Do the capitalists have not seen, whom they pushed into power and financed? Well seen and consciously indulged and indulge such people and such ideas, in order to protect their profits from the wrath of the workers. Take, as an example, George Bush (Jr.) or Barack Obama. How many people died because of the US policy of “exporting democracy”. I think big business has washed the hands, no way.
Third – who ever came up with to ascribe to democracy Russian Federation, and any other capitalist country? Democracy is democracy. And what we have with democracy? It never in the capitalist countries did not exist. Democracy the capitalists cover their dictates and cover very skillfully, I must admit. But how much rope does not veysya…
The poll of 2016 showed that back in the USSR wants 76% of the Russian population. Except the USSR was a liberal country? No, but democracy in the USSR was an order of magnitude greater than in Russia. Do we now move towards the restoration of the USSR? Also not, if only to technical bonding bourgeois republics in the likeness of the EU.
What people think about big business? Numerous attempts to conduct a survey on this topic did not give accurate results. Why? The answer is given by those who were interviewed – the vast majority of the population simply refuses to exist.
A liberal society certainly exist, it is necessary to consider, but you should also take into account the fact that not all societies have certain principles of the device.
By the way the “old” lights of democracy and liberalism (in the UK) nationalized almost all banks out of fear that private banks will not be able to survive a crisis.
Our authorities is to admit that our society is not liberal, but at the forefront of the President and the government constantly put the liberal values, despite their degrading effect on people. Three decades of liberal reforms, Mozgova on TV and Newspapers almost failed. The increase in liberal attitudes among young people causing ecstasy among the power structures, but they soon disappointed, because the liberalism of the young is flushed out of the brain once they have to deal with bourgeois reality, as they have to earn and spend their money, and not the parent.
Subconsciously people tend to just device companies to the maximum number of participants in the economic process were provided with decent benefits and opportunity. But this is only possible under socialism (communism). Under socialism Cybernetics can help workers in the organization of the entire economic complex. Under Stalin, all the plans had to count manually, but today Cybernetics can do it more efficiently. The state planning Commission will calculate a special computer program, they will monitor the implementation process at each state enterprise, efficiently anticipating and responding to problems. Strict government regulation in the sectors covered by socialist production and financial control over the remaining small businesses, allow the socialist enterprises steadily to master all the areas of production and overcome the remnants of capitalism in the economy. Also, the state needs to be of high social mobility and workers ‘ control over the leadership, that’s not right – lowered, work well – go up. Only one power can control these points – the power of the workers. Real democracy is only possible under the dictatorship of the proletariat.
