Home / Money / The Colonel and his $ 120 million

The Colonel and his $ 120 million

Полковник и его 120 миллионов долларов

The Colonel, whose home is found 8 billion rubles (more – 120 million dollars and 2 million euros), makes one wonder – how many regional budgets are in the tables of the generals. The case is clear, private, although in reality it has all the system features.

The consequence asserts that the Colonel “systematically” received bribes – that is, translate the question into the plane of banal corruption.

To corruption that is happening in Russia, of course, irrelevant. Corruption is purely a market act of sale of powers of office. Voluntary, it should be noted – and therefore the market. When a bribe becomes a mandatory attribute of the relationship with officials is not corruption, it’s a tribute. It’s hard to call the landlord, collecting rents from tax-paying peasants, the corrupt official. Or the Baron, put the castle near the bridge (or the bridge near the castle) and collecting a fee for passage over the bridge. Here we are talking about rental income in its purest form.

In Russia built a feudal caste society, where the post is a tool of collecting rents. All vertical control – known textbook 6th grade vassalage, and belonging to a ruling caste – lifelong and hereditary. Capitalism or socialism all the events we have has not the slightest relationship attempts to use the conceptual apparatus of class society lead to misunderstandings and completely wrong qualification of the state in which we reside.

There are, of course, features that were not there 200 years ago – but most of them is purely technical and technological nature. If during the Biron Internet perhaps that analogy would be more complete.

The deliberate destruction of the industrial economy and put it in subsistence farming, the destruction of industry and construction in its place trivial primitive crafts – this is a deliberate or unconscious policy of consolidation of feudal relations. No industry, no development – there is no danger to the stability of the established neo-feudal education.

In principle, you can live in such a country. But at the same time, you need to understand that even the current 140 million people to it would be excessive – primitive primitive economy needs workers who regularly come from Central Asia. The indigenous population becomes superfluous, and therefore exterminated through the reduction of social, medical standards, deteriorating quality of life. In principle, the ruling class will have nothing against if indigenous people are going to recapture the migrants right to exist – but we all have to lower their demands. To move to the barracks, go to noodles and not just settle for a small, but microscopically small. By the way, so calls to expel migrants in places of their traditional residence do not give – the ruling nobility are quite satisfied with such a question when the above mentioned condition.

The output, of course, is always there. In our case, is repetition: the complete elimination of the current ruling class, re-industrialization, the construction of a complex economy and on sustainable development. Only difficult arranged, the economy is able to transform the society to create class device and prepare it to next stages of development. Putin’s stability is a dead end. Moreover, the impasse descending – ahead of only the degradation, the rights of the ruling elite, a new serfdom (by the way, the ban on travel abroad – the first stage. Next we will be anchoring at the place of residence, the attribution to specific lords, we all have in our history took place. In Russia serfdom was also formed not simultaneously). And, of course, purely Asiatic despotism, in large measure, to which we have already come close.

In this future, any prospects the country has not. We, as before, will sell the most simplistic products, and the most popular will be all the same Russian soldiers who they send to die for the interests of foreign “partners” – as, for example, now they are dying in Syria.

I deliberately did not say that we have a chance to change – you need to go to the polls and choose a decent. It’s a bluff. Such systems do not transformirovalsya through elections, elections are part of the reproduction of such systems. If you are over the current stability, then, of course, you need to go and vote. It is your inalienable and constitutional right. At least before the peasants could not choose his landlord – there is an undoubted achievement. However, today, we have to choose from one candidate, all of the same collective or personal, so the achievement looks a bit phantom. No matter how considered, the output is the same pure feudalism of the spill.

Check Also

Research, re-measure – and don’t rush: how to avoid a kitchen extension nightmare

Absent builders, dodgy contractors, endless delays – our renovation project quickly went off the rails. …