If countries are unable to adopt a unified stance against hate terrorism and even find it difficult to give a General definition of terrorism, it is not surprising that terrorism takes many lives.
Centers of influence waging war by proxy, using terrorism as a tool for the subordination of the countries with which they compete. The country, whose interests collide, consider the attacks as a weak link to each other. Almost every country is subject to the weakening of its competitors supports and fuels the attacks.
A widespread hypocrisy on the issue of terrorism!
The U.S. openly supported bin Laden (bin Laden) and “al-Qaeda” against the Soviet Union. It seems there is no European country that would not support the Kurdistan workers ‘ party (PKK) against Turkey. More recently, at the European Parliament were decorated with pictures of terrorists of the PKK, and in the centre of Brussels, a tent was set up for its members. Remember how the terrorists ‘ leader Ocalan (Öcalan), taken from Syria, seen in such countries as Russia, Greece, Italy, — not as a terrorist but as an important guest. Belgium, an EU member for decades passed fahrie of Turkey, Erdal (Fehriye Erdal), the suspect in the murder of a businessman Sabanci (Sabancı).
The words and actions of the countries on the issue of terrorist organizations and terrorism are substantially different from each other. Many of the countries that formally rejects terror and terrorism, unofficially support terrorist organizations. This is confirmed terrorists have seized documents and weapons.
On the issue of terrorism in the country are lying to themselves and others. Nothing feeds terrorism as the double standards and hypocrisy. Today a common political position was the concept of “your terrorist is good, my terrorist is bad”.
In 1979, when the Soviet Union occupied Afghanistan, the CIA organized jihadist groups. In 1980-e years in Pakistan were opened jihadist schools — “madrasas”. The students of these madrasahs were called “Taliban”. The mission of these schools was not the interpretation of Islam, while brainwashing them and turning students into robots, ready to die.
The result of the US-backed “Taliban” gave rise to al-Qaeda(a terrorist organization banned in Russia — approx. ed.). Jihadist education is a product of the occupation of Afghanistan and Chechnya. And the American occupation of Iraq was the reason for the return of al-Qaeda as ISIS (a terrorist organization banned in Russia — approx. ed.).
Today, ISIL is hurting those who created it yesterday.
Terror is the fault of humanity, not of Islam!
When the terrorist attack occurred in France, explain the words “we are faced with Islamic terrorism”, or when talking about a “crusade” after the September 11 attacks, it does not shed light on the real facts. To consider terrorism as “forms of Islam” or the product of the radicalization of Islam means to legitimize terror.
Terror is the flaw of human existence. This is the epitome of the mentality of antigene, which breaks into human life and values. There is no such ethnic structure, ideology, or religious convictions, whose members would be immune from terrorism. In this sense, the religious faith of a person who becomes a weapon of terrorism, whether Islam, Judaism or Christianity, is of secondary importance.
The terrorist who killed more than 50 people in the us state of Florida, ” ethnic “stranger”, but culturally American. The man responsible for the attack on a truck in France — on the ethnic origin of Arab, religious beliefs Muslim, but he was also born and raised in the French culture.
Moreover, most of the young people joining ISIS in Europe — socially integrated people. Due to the fact that some joined the ranks of ISIS jihadists not know the Arabic language, was created battalions which speak French. Even when European jihadists broke away from the society in which they lived, they remained loyal to the Western model. Terrorism using bomb cars or attack of the suicide bomber is nihilistic in nature, which does not correspond to Islamic traditions.
A feature of the terrorism of the ISIS is that it is more Western than Islamic.
Despite all these realities, an important need in the study of the question is, why the bloody game that builds centers-hegemony, always played among Muslims. The analysis of this situation will become obvious that humanity is faced with reaction, created the anger that originates in colonialism, finds fertile ground during the occupation, fuelled by inequality and exclusion.
First you need to understand the problem behind what is seen on the surface. And understand half to decide.
