Do the leaders of European countries-members of NATO intend to follow the example of josé Manuel Barroso, who, after his presidency at the European Commission, a lobbyist for Goldman Sachs /Goldman Sachs/? Maybe they used the NATO summit in order to prepare the transition to work at General dynamics, Much” /General Dynamics/ or in some other weapons company? Of course this assumption is absurd, but it is less absurd than the statement at the July NATO summit in Warsaw on the deployment of new chetyrehchastnaya mobile troops in Poland or in one of the Baltic States located at the distance of a cannon shot from the base of the Russian fleet and St.-Petersburg.
The Russian leadership now feels humiliated by NATO – organization during the cold war, which was supposed to disappear along with the Soviet Union (1) due to the fact that the summit was organized in the city where in 1955 under the auspices of the USSR signed the Warsaw Pact. A statement of the General of the US army, the new commander of NATO forces in Europe Curtis Scaparrotti did not improve the situation: “the Structure of command must be flexible enough to go from peaceful to provocative to combat the normal way” (2). Moreover, the Alliance also invited Petro Poroshenko – President of Ukraine a non – country member of NATO and in a state of escalating conflict with Russia. Is that not a provocation?
