USA played surprisingly imitation of the attack of the Russian aviation on the destroyer “Donald cook” in the Baltic sea. However, as we have already noted, Russia is able to suppress the electronic systems of communication and vehicle management. And she did it, says Manlio Dinucci, since the ship has violated the Treaty on the elimination of INF. In addition, the U.S. nuclear deployment in the very moment when China is developing hypersonic media, part of the trajectory which will be a plan that inspires new research and the American Agency DARPA. Raytheon and Lockheed Martin have already begun to implement similar programs “Tactical Boost Glide” (TBG).
The white House is “concerned” that Russian fighter jets flew close to a U.S. ship in the Baltic sea, “simulating the attack”. Is presented our news agencies. Without specifying, however, what kind of ship is it and for what purpose he was in the Baltic sea.
And we are talking about the destroyer “Donald cook”, one of four submarines deployed by the U.S. Navy for “the protection of NATO missiles in Europe.” These ships, whose number will be increased, equipped with the Aegis radar and interceptor missiles SM-3, but at the same time carry Tomahawk cruise missiles equipped with both conventional and nuclear warheads. In other words, it’s the shock of nuclear attack submarines, equipped with “shield” to neutralize the retaliatory air strike.
So, “Donald cook”, released on April 11 from the Polish port of Gdynia, and two days patrolling at a distance of about 70 km from the Russian naval base in Kaliningrad flew over for the occasion Russian fighter jets and helicopters. In addition to missile-carrying ships, the us-NATO “shield” in its current configuration includes the radar “forward-based” in Turkey, the American battery of 24 ground-based SM-3 missiles in Romania and another one similar that will be deployed in Poland.
Moscow warns: these ground based batteries that can run and also Tomahawk cruise missiles, constitute a clear violation of the INF Treaty (intermediate-and short-range), which prohibits the deployment of nuclear medium-range missiles.
How would the United States, which accuse Russia that these overflights it provokes “unnecessary escalation”, — if Russia sent a missile to their banks and turned a missile battery in Cuba and in Mexico?
Nobody in the major media that continue to obscure reality, not wonder. The last “unnoticed” news: announced on 11 April the European command of U.S. forces, the deployment of the most advanced American fighter-bombers, nuclear attack F-22 Raptor from Tyndall base in Florida to base Licences in England. From England these F-22 “will be redeployed to bases of the NATO front line, to maximize opportunities and training to implement containment of any action, destabilizing European security”.
This is preparation for imminent deployment in Europe, including Italy, the latest American nuclear bombs B61-12, which, being thrown from the range of about 100 km, the munition hit the target “with four selectable power levels”. This new weaponry is part of the program of development of nuclear forces, adopted by the Obama administration, and providing among other things, shock 12 extra submarines ($7 billion apiece, the first on the stocks), each of which can carry 200 nuclear warheads.
Newspaper New York Times reported the development of new type nuclear warheads, “planning a hypersonic projectile” (“Tactical Boost Glide”, TBG), which return to the atmosphere maneuvers to Dodge missiles, and heading at a speed of over 27,000 km/h. A similar weapon developed by Russia and China.
Meanwhile Washington is reaping the fruits. Transforming Europe in the front line of a nuclear conflict, he sabotages (with the help of the very European governments) and economic relations of the EU with Russia, with the aim inseparable to bind the EU to the US through the TTIP. At the same time he urges European allies to increase their military spending to the greater benefit of the American military-industrial complex, the exports of which during the last five years has increased by 60%, becoming the predominant position of American exports.
Who said that war does not make money?
