Atomic bomb History
15.09.2016
Policy
55 Views
Why the West is at war with Russia? Want to profit on the resource-rich territories or is there another reason?
At the dawn of the nuclear bomb, people thought that created a real weapon of mass destruction after the atomic bomb destroyed EN masse. Quickly and ruthlessly. Killed instantly, leaving on the pavement a print of the shadows. To use such weapons was easy — Hiroshima and Nagasaki is an example, but the effects were no less devastating. Areas that used nuclear weapons, was deserted — take, do not want, but to take something just did not want to, because everything was poisoned for years to come. Because nuclear weapons were only a deterrent, and in modern wars used better weapons, not less than mass destruction — history, that is, distortion. This weapon of mass destruction is more perfect and more powerful, and most importantly — gives you all the resources, just spoiling and maiming of the human soul. About what is worse: the death of the soul or the death of the body, the debate makes no sense — the body can be acquired, and the soul is one, the other will not give. Because I want to talk about something else — about the spirals of history.
And the first thing I want to say this about stereotypes hammered into us at school.
Remember how in the movie “Live till Monday”, one of the students says that after Peter the great of Russia did not carry on the kings? In my opinion, this wild delusion, but in school we hammer that Peter the great was a reformer, the king of the innovator, the king of the carpenter, which served as a great feat. From the point of view of control head, not able to find good players, and makes you a bad leader, but destroyed my stereotype of the great king of the carpenter, not the governance rules, and a brilliant poet Alexander Pushkin.
In the early ‘ 80s, our house was enriched with the complete works of the great poet in 10 volumes. At last, the tenth volume was described the plan of the novel about Peter the Great and this a plan and ruined all my ideas about the king as a great reformer. Maybe it’s because Pushkin wrote a novel about Peter that I read collected, he saw that the greatness is just not it? If you manage to find and read the plan, then maybe you will see what I mean.
Pushkin, collecting data about Peter, broke them over the years: was there, went there, did this or that. As a result, collected consecutive dry facts of the imagination. The movement of the king is like the movement of accipitrinae fleas. The king rushed through the cities and villages, like the loons, trying to sew rasshivaevu and to push nevpihuemoe. As for Royal decrees, read them, understand that state for a long time without any other income except income from taverns and the sale of tobacco. Decrees on tobacco and pubs appear in the Royal activities punctually, inducing the idea that the king with maniacal persistence has dragged his subjects to the Smoking and drinking.
Of course, the feeling is not a matter on which to build conclusions, but we are wanting to obtain a concept about a particular movie, book, or politician, read the articles in encyclopedias. Here is something of the sort, but more detailed created and Pushkin, completely smashing my conviction that Peter the great was really Great. But this is just an example of how easy it is to break the stereotype. I want to talk about something else — about Ukraine, which uses an old trick — divide and conquer. Very old, 13-14 century, in the old days break in Poland and Lithuania.
Advocates of the purity and reliability of the data warn that the historical facts taken from Wikipedia. There are two reasons, both of them simple: first, this article does not pretend to historical research, and second, Wikipedia is exclusively Pro-Western resource, which distorts the story as we need the West, because the data there is sharpened in the right direction.
Germany and Russia are long time partners, and given the fact that East Germany is on the ancient Slavic lands, the relations between our countries more than it seems at first glance.
Next comes the personal conviction needed to drive a wedge between Russia, with its notions of truth and honor, and the West, therefore on the way from Russia to the West appeared first angry dog: Grand Duchy of Lithuania and created the first barrier between Russia and the West.
What in the name of the Principality appear the adjective “great” speaks of unfulfilled ambitions dwarf, and if you add to that the fact that the first velikolitovskie Prince was baptized in Catholicism, and very nice it turns out.
Personal belief: in the 13th century in Lithuania were sown the seeds of the imaginary significance, importance and necessity in European Affairs, the flowers which are now again flourished in the modern Baltic States and dazzled the Baltic border States.
Then came the turn of Poland, which in the 14th century they turned from ordinary to Great Poland, to come to Catholicism, and in the early 16th century in Poland began democracy was limited to the power of the king, and the powers left to the gentry, which is a true Polish ambition began to show off.
Say, what’s the harm? And this here is that even then Poland was destroyed and subordinated to, pascalimplementation — slave system the best of all times and Nations — the United States will not lie. The transfer of power from one to many means the transfer of power to the external management, because the throne can ascend strong and intelligent sovereign, acting solely in the interests of the state, and nobility is nobility… gonoristyh. In the case of the admission/rejection decision, and no one is responsible for anything that can be seen on the example of any modern Parliament.
Then came the 16th century when the Livonian war, Russia lost part of the territory, and in the early 17th century Poland came to the walls of Moscow, kissed and went back empty-handed.
The Russian-Polish war was raging almost the entire 17th century and early 18th, and then came into Germany.
When did the Russo-German war, Poland had hard times. The Commonwealth was not just passed back and enemy troops, and more than once divided between Russia and Germany. But here I must say that the poles themselves up… dovyezhivalis. We would sit quietly, and none of them did not recall any of the Livonian campaign, nor the death of the first official guide to the Russian North — Ivan Susanin. But Germany got from the soul — in 1760, the year Russia for the first time took Berlin.
In those days came free the Baltic States copper basin, and Poland began to divide. To carve the pie, even Austria rode. So, Poland was divided, and then this state is annihilated by Russia and Poland finally calmed down, and then shifting military vector — the war has gone South, to Turkey, which stirred up the West, and Russia and Germany, on the contrary, the moment of unity and weddings Russian Grand Dukes and German princes.
Annihilation of the Baltic States and Poland with Russia and then the onset of relative peace on the Western borders of Russia to reinforce the personal belief that these States were created and brought up in the spirit of provocateurs creating a problem between Russia and the West.
Subsequent history shows that the belief is still not without Foundation. Then came the 20th century and the First World war, where again the main characters were Russia and Germany. It all ended in tears for both Russia and Germany, as the wreckage of two empires, like mushrooms increased Baltic border States and Poland, which formed a vicious dog on the doorstep, and began to bark at both sides, trying to embroil Germany and Russia.
But not on the ran. Stalin did not Chica, quickly annexed the Baltic States, pushing the boundaries of Leningrad and Moscow, and giving myself a couple of weeks the odds are in the event of invasion.
By the way, the Baltic States would do well to understand that it is just a springboard for the invasion of Russia. Was, is, and will be starting in the 13th century, like Poland, but alas, the history lessons no one teaches. All that I learned Poland, is the consciousness of his greatness and aristocratic arrogance. Say this on personal experience with the poles, one of whom, pointing to me, said never forgive the death of their President, who killed it but why would he give up?
But back to the past, fortunately, not much time left. Post-war Europe is slightly silenced, but only until the fall of the USSR, and then began another revival of a fence between the West and Russia. The Baltic States quickly took off to the West, along with Poland and what is now these countries are perfectly well known — they are the main prosecutors of Russia in Europe and the world, but their strength is not enough to qualitatively bark at Russia, and the disengagement of the West and the East connected the Ukraine.
Birthmarks newborn anti-Russian dog visible to everyone:
1.The change of the dominant Church, that is a blow to the soul.
2.Hammering into the heads of self-importance, “great”.
That is, the introduction of technology, run-for centuries. Something similar to what is happening in Ukraine, was observed in Lithuania and Poland centuries ago.
To the question: who should be able to answer for yourself, I have an answer, but if the filaments are drawn in the 13th century and the Catholic Church, the heritage here is clearly not the US, which, again personal opinion, is only a puppet. But I can ask the question: why? And I will answer.
Resources? Not really.
Oil and gas is full in the middle East, Africa and South America, places where the government manual, and the people more docile and gullible.
The forest grows better in South Africa. From planting to marketable condition is just 20 years old, and not 80-100 as in the Northern hemisphere. South Africa annually exports 17 million cubic meters, and forests planted with only 1% of the state. And if you put at least 5-6%? Whether it will be Siberia with a density of mosquito — million per cubic meter? Not at all.
By the way, fossils in Africa fully take it, don’t want to. And the natives they didn’t need.
Territory? And what the Europeans will agree to live, for example, on the shore of the White sea, though the South, though the North? And this is not Siberia, and certainly not Magadan. And those that agree, and do come, get here a business without any risk to die on the battlefield for a place under the sun.
So why?
I have only one answer: the war with Russia, destroying a hostile ideology.
The motto the power of the truth.
For the ability to fight to the death in fighting for what is right.
For the ability to forgive enemies and the first to lend a hand.
That is the main reason why Russia is fighting for centuries, using the same technology, and the end is the same: either they us, or we them.
Who’s who will win? As Klyuchevsky said, “history is not a teacher but an overseer. History teaches nothing, but severely punishes for ignorance of lessons.”
From the lessons of history personally, I know that the Russians took Berlin twice, in 1760 and 1945, and from the lessons of literature know that “God loves a Trinity”, because, I think, to Berlin-we will get there. But in the literal sense, or figurative remains to be seen.
