Israel Semicubical<button id=”resizeFSJS” class=”resizeFS” title=”Change font size”>Aa</button>
Why the West is fueling war hysteria against Russia?
Russia can’t do anything to prevent this hysteria. Nothing except more fighting, gotowebsite: Alexey BULATOV
Our commentator believes that anti-Russian propaganda in the Anglo-American media may lead to war
For a long time – maybe since the Cuban crisis of a sharp foreboding of the war with Russia in the West was not. This is indicated by all the Anglo-American Newspapers – and they have a consensus arises not always. Although almost all English-language media owned by a small handful of people. As a rule, they try to reflect a reasonable range of views. But not now. All the Anglo-American media say about Russia the way they talked about Iraq before the invasion in 2003. Not always, such campaigns end the war – the West does not attack Iran and North Korea. But it is necessary to any Western blog or website to call for peace with Russia, as the elders immediately branded as a “Russian agent”.
President Obama has offered was to say that America is not the first to use nuclear weapons against Russia – but the country’s leadership, including Secretary of state John Kerry, indignant: how can you refuse this option? In the wall Street Journal discuss whether America is to destroy Russia with a first nuclear strike. “Newsweek” Professor Alexander Motyl says all that Russia is Nazi Germany and the world with her is impossible! General Breedlove, until recently the commander of us forces in Europe and NATO forces looking for a way to get more heavy weapons to Ukraine, hoping to start a war.
Almost all the media of Britain and America continually incite war hysteria. John Pilger, an experienced British journalist (Australian origin), explains the rabid hostility of the English media and English establishment to the labour leader Jeremy Corbin – he’s against the war. He’s the only one who doesn’t want to upgrade bombs and missiles and carry troops to the Russian border.
In the same guilty and Donald trump. What a wave of hatred raised against him, the media! For what? Because he doesn’t want to fight. The press of the US and Britain are bent on war with Russia – or, at least, in balancing on the brink of war. It is difficult to understand why it could start a war, but I want to tell you directly – Russia can’t do anything to prevent this hysteria. Nothing but enhance the combat readiness than now engaged Commander in chief.
That’s why I was hesitant to write this column. Whether to warn if sense the warning there. There is no reason to panic, especially since it will not help. All the same – and in the West, and in Russia – ruled by politicians and state officials, not the press. But for a proper understanding of the situation it is good to keep in mind what the media says. Hopefully that will carry – as carried during the Cuban missile crisis in the middle of the last century, when the Americans were seriously planning to unleash a nuclear slaughter.
Russia was already in that position in 1939. If in 1914, the head of Russia stood weak autocrat to get involved in the war at the request of friends of the Entente – England and France, in order to protect the Serbs, or for some other reason, in 1939 Russia rules man of iron will, who wanted to save the country from war at almost any cost – even at the cost of reconciliation with Hitler and supply raw material resources of Germany. And yet the war came.
Why do they need war? To revive the economy, revived the American economy the second world war? Indeed, in 1940, the U.S. stock exchange and all the achievements of the “New deal” was a house of cards – after a multi-million human losses during the great Depression. To return the unipolar world and full dominion over the world? To fulfill Chekhov’s “Hanging on the wall the gun should shoot?”
It is difficult to answer unequivocally. Need to rely on the strong nerves of the Russian leadership and the coalition of people of good will. Not yet evening, but the clouds thickened.
