After the terrorist attack in Orlando, President Barack Obama urged to impose restrictions on the sale of weapons to potential terrorists. Correspondents iREACTOR asked well-known Russian journalist Anatoly Wasserman to tell who Americans can get into the black list and is not a violation of human rights, the division of society:
Sorry really not possible to determine who might commit a crime in the future, but to some extent it coming. So, the man whom Barack Obama would like to see the next President, the presidential candidate Donald trump, offers not allowed into the United States of Muslims, but does not explain what to do with those millions who are already living in the United States.
The Republicans are afraid of Muslims because in Islam a few more than in other religions of the world versions, it is proposed that different types of violence. Even initially, Islam was established more aggressive way than Christianity.
As for the presumption of innocence, it is a presumption – assumption. It works in those conditions, when there is no reason for other assumptions. For example, is clearly a totalitarian sect banned due to the fact that they generally allow violence, while each follower individually can be anything and is not guilty, and neither has any obvious danger is not.
In this regard, I do not think the proposal of the American President is completely wrong legally. However, as far as I know the position of the whole democratic party in relation to an armed civil-defense, I have no reason to expect that this proposal will be given due extension. Rather, Obama and the Democrats will try to ban all forms of civil self-defence and to me this development is not happy. In the US, of course, some excessive freedom of an armed civil-defense, but that’s no reason to rush from one extreme to another.
