Major political figures are not unambiguous and “pleasant in all respects” to all. Then, they Figure!
Here and around the name Muammar Gaddafi, the leader of the Libyan Revolution, the Libyan Jamahiriya (that is – “a country ruled by the people”) have accumulated a lot of things.
In Libya of the Gaddafi era have been not uncommon as a correspondent of the newspaper “Pravda”. I saw a lot, learned a lot… Twice I then sent the “top team” – such were the manners.
The video on the channel “Time – f” (the Lives of remarkable people), exposed next, is an attempt to assess the situation, which was made a few years ago. And today I dedicated this post to the events five years ago, when on 20 October 2011 in the midst of NATO aggression against Libya was killed Muammar Gaddafi… his “double”. It is incomprehensible…
Recently it became clear that the need for the elimination of Gaddafi was pointed out personally by Hillary Clinton, arriving in Libya to the rebels in the fall of 2011:
At that time Hillary Clinton was Secretary of state, i.e. foreign Minister, whose responsibilities did not include the overthrow of other governments members of the United Nations. Or, after all, it is in the US – part?!
And here the ill-famous recognition U.S. Secretary of State (sic!) about the murder of the head of a sovereign member state of the UN:
So, opinions – on the 5th anniversary – present a variety.
Here and think, dear readers, where is the “Golden mean”.
Oh, not simple was the Colonel to him now, as I hear, only one color we have to “draw”.
The program ZHZL “Who is Muammar Gaddafi?”:
Today, there has already been more talk about “the heroic Libyan people”…
So, what is its current “heroism”? – Pummel fellow?
Note that there – in the former Jamahiriya – the common people simply no! And what is there today?
More than 600 tribes inhabiting the territory of Cyrenaica, Tripolitania and Fezzan (of these three regions and tried to put a United Libya), are locked in mortal combat – after the collapse of the Central government over control of their oasis. In some areas full of oil and gas. In that now the meaning of their struggle. And each had its heroes.
– At the moment even in Tripoli, shooting at each other. After all, the winner wants to gain control over Libyan oil. While shooting at each other before the destruction of the corpses so that Qaddafi long ago turned over in his grave!
In the press: “…the Goodness spreads through the streets of Tripoli…” D,B…
– Overall, two or even three “governments” (I lost count) personally, Libya’s sit – in addition to the “in” Tripoli (West), and “under” Tripoli – foreign (strannoi?) the base and “in” Tobruk (East). The applicant from Tobruk in this quarrel also wants to gain control over Libyan oil in the East.
Well, wish no harm… Only – “who does he give?” Oil? Gas? So, to these important local resources “Makhno” when everything calms down, and will not allow “foreign uncle”. Nothing, perhaps, the Jamahiriya, NATO was breached?!
All deposits and oil and gas pipelines sooner or later it will take control of NATO forces, and no local sheikhs from postnye to the pipe just would not let the distance of the bullet! They will be unhappy? – So, they themselves have prescribed the Future with their own “grasping hands”. Will get from NATO “thirty”, and with enough of them. And they, the disease thought will be different: “Misurata – the city of the Sun!” – Yes “do not tell my Slippers”!
Remember, in Libya today there is no foreign intervention “a La Syria”! They – and local – are fighting and destroying each other: flame in the tribe, the town of the city. This is the reality. Yes, there are in their ranks and “filibusters” from ISIS, but they can, figuratively speaking, a “handful” – strangers, however…
But soon here will take power into the hands of serious uncles from those countries that once deribanili Africa called “colonialists”. And for them, local chaos is the best field of preparation “for the coming of the peacekeepers from the West”! All just on knees will fall, welcoming the “saviors”.
At the time, only king Idris I, and behind him, Gaddafi was able to “rehabilitate” the Libyan historical “Makhnovshchina”. As you did not the Central government, all the local nature and crept out of the woodwork. And some blood will have to restore unity torn into parochial enclaves of Libya, hardly anyone will dare to assume?
But the real interventio Western forces under the flag of “settlement,” they still wait. And all the oil by Libyan cash – go you know where…
So, no “heroic people” there. And there is a fragmentation of the territories, up to the oases, and tens of thousands of graves from internal strife. And all this leads to local “hero” in a state of complete chaos and historical failure! And then neo-colonial yoke. But, after all, “yourself, all by yourself…”
Gaddafi once condemned – the witness in the 1980-ies for cool dealing with the opposition. He beat them, and it was hurtful! But, well knew with whom he was dealing with those forces that today are tearing the country apart for personal. or clan interests.
Now in Libya “oasis of democracy”? Yes – “oasis of Chaos”: killings of opposition or no opposition – they have themselves to each other in the graves of the drive by the thousands! Colonel many coffins of compatriots never dreamed of!
“No,” and the former “Libya”, and will not in the foreseeable future, thanks to the “introduction of democracy” in “this country” (“this country” – USA style) from the “democratizers” of NATO.
But “democratic closure”: “Opposition in power!” Moreover, once in several cities. Bingo!
“Paved with good intentions the road to Hell!” About it, though, there is ever heard?
The massacre of Gaddafi has no excuses. Especially since there in the video was recorded the soldiers of European appearance (not local – for sure!). The video with them already erased from the Network, but reminiscences are left. “Manuscripts do not burn!”
Who has copies – post here.
French foreign Legion participated in the murder of Gaddafi (aired 2012 5:14):
And another view with a different angle on the incident. So here is the text lifted from the depths of his archive from the summer of 2011.
Yes, I want to quote – to present a more complex picture of what happened – this material is a blogger under the nickname fat-fag that back in the summer spread “on the shelves” the fact that today almost no one remembers:
“…Libya has signed multibillion-dollar contracts for the purchase of Russian weapons, in exchange for the cancellation received more than $ 7 billion. debt, Dating back to the Soviet Union. That is the same amount Gaddafi had to buy our weapons.
Signed was for $ 2 billion. Initialed by another $ 2 billion. But almost nothing delivered. T. K. pulled, pulled, pulled. And it is Gaddafi and pulled. Parallel to negotiating with the West. And in the end threw HIMSELF.
Wouldnt trade with all, on the market, and not throwing all – had had 4 divisions of s-300PMU-2, and a bunch of “Tor-M2E” and “Buk-M2E” and su-35СЭ (maybe su-30MKA, but also wonderful), and T-90СА, and upgraded T-72М1К, and boats, and boats, and “Yakhont”, and the new ACU air defense…
And all that is – is also would have been omogenizarea. Since the lifting of sanctions, years of us ate it all. And who would put it to him? The French? Yeah, right now! Even amers would have thought a hundred times and changed my mind.
Everything was done by the Russian defense enterprises is a few cheap contracts for repairs Libyan military equipment (like a couple million dollars). These contracts for repairs were made by us in advance, free of charge, “as a sign of friendship and good intentions.” But even these irodovska amounts Gaddafi paid only partially! Therefore, by the way, Lavrov said that “let Gaddafi will first pay”. That is the word of him we no longer believe! (And, incidentally, doing the right thing!)
And well if Gaddafi really had no money! And remember how many tens of billions have been frozen Libyan accounts in U.S. and Europe? And the gold reserves of Libya, the components a lot more than 100 billion??? And that Libya would be impoverished from these 4 billion??? Now imagine how amplified would the Libyan army, if these contracts were made, especially in the area of air defence, as an incredibly topical at present!!!
On account of debt relief Gaddafi also promised Russia and a naval base in Libya. But the question about the Libyans it was postponed and postponed… That’s goodcialis.
In addition, in early 2011, Gazprom bought Italian Eni’s 33% in one of the largest in Libya’s Elephant oil and gas fields, the documents went to the Libyan government, but the deal was never completed because the documents were quietly buried in the Libyan ministries. Again, no “friendly relations” on the part of Libya as it is not observed.
Now look at the cooperation of Libya with the Western countries.
In December 2007, during Gaddafi’s visit in Paris a Memorandum was signed on the purchase by Libya of a large consignment of French weapons worth up to 4.5 billion euros. This package is pre-included 14 fighter Dassault Rafale, 10 military helicopters Eurocopter Tiger, 15 transport helicopters Eurocopter Caracal EC 725 (Cougar), 10 light helicopters Eurocopter AS.550 Fennec, two corvettes Gowind project, eight patrol boats, 13 wheeled armored combat vehicles ERC90 Sagaie, 25 light armored vehicles VBL, 60 VAB wheeled armored vehicles, as well as MICA UR class “air-air” (and possibly, in the form of SAMS), 155 mm CAESAR self-propelled howitzers, and air defense radar. In addition, reference was made to the repair and modernization of 17 fighters Dassault Mirage F. 1, the air force of Libya (in addition to the 12 repaired under contract, 2006). According to the Memorandum, the final purchase was agreed upon by the two governments by 1 July 2008.
Really Gaddafi the French actually have thrown anything they have on the package is not bought (although individual contracts for all small things with French were).
Gaddafi signed contracts with the United States, and SAS even trained his security, but in the end, again, all threw.
Libya revised and PSA with Western oil and gas companies decided to reduce the share of Western companies to 20%, whereas in the SPR, the proportion is from 20% to 55% (for comparison, Russian companies working in 10.5%).
Let us vote in the UN.
First, UN security Council resolution No. 1970 (i.e., the first resolution) – Gaddafi was agree. What he had stated. So we have no complaints and can not be.
Second, the initiator of UN security Council resolution No. 1973 (i.e., second resolution) was the League of Arab States. It (LAG) made this proposal to the UN security Council, she could have it his proposal and to take back. This resolution was supported by the African Union (though not all members). That is, if Russia vetoed the proposal of the League of Arab States, this would not be an “act of conscience”, “international law” etc., and it would be a slap in the face again of the League of Arab States and the African Union (with which Gaddafi himself and blew it), not the US, NATO and their ilk.
It was necessary for Russia? Or is it not?
Thirdly, Russia has not supported the UN security Council resolution No. 1973, however, and China, which could veto the resolution, but also said nothing, although his economic interests in Libya several times more the Russian. I wonder why China is no one’s blaming anything?
Fourth, well, was this UN security Council resolution № 1973, so what? What was written there – all of urine, bomb, burn? No, it was about “ensuring a no-fly space”,” embargo on arms” and other garbage. That’s such a horror?
In principle, Gaddafi this is not cold and not hot – bomb and so he rebels bombed (only once, before the adoption of the resolution – bombed military stores, fell into the hands of rebels, as well as more military depots into the hands of the rebels did not fall…), weapons, loyal to the Libyan government troops and so much more than the rebels, so there is nothing particularly wrong with the resolution no.
Another thing is that France, England, USA and some other countries have used this unfortunate resolution as a Fig leaf to cover their real intentions.
In the fifth. And that the operation in Libya showed concrete solidarity of NATO members? Or the invincible military machine of NATO? Or the inevitable victory of the NATO? This operation showed rather a confusion and hesitation among NATO members, discord in the lead, complaining of lack of ammunition, reluctance to participate in actual combat (but only to simulate the type of patrols,…), disgusting accurate results and low efficiency and so on… something I did not cause any reverence to NATO. Here’s a picture of the real combat capability of NATO!
Sixthly: is Gaddafi Russia in something accused? Why I have not heard a single bad word against Russia. Or maybe I missed something? So with a hangover all the “sides” accuse the leaders of Russia, the betrayal of Libya and Gaddafi personally???
Seventh, all wanting to weep for the economic damage to the Russian economy: the $ 4 billion Gaddafi promised us a few years and have not paid, and it is unlikely you would have paid in the near future (especially considering how many he threw exactly the same and even a large amount)…
Now compare with Syria. The situation with Syria are diametrically opposed. Syria has always treated us very well. We have with Syria, a Treaty on friendship and cooperation. And we are there. Tartus. E & P NAVY. Was, is and will be. And being renovated and extended. And is quite likely to occur there full-fledged naval base. Syria, in principle, not against it. (Especially at the present time of troubles.)
In addition, while Gaddafi bustled, Dodge, bargaining and throw – Syria systematically concluded with Russia the Treaty on military-technical cooperation and properly paid for it. And Russia, in turn, is properly performed.
We put Syria quite a lot: ATGM “Kornet-e”, zrpk “Carapace-S” air defense system “Pechora-2M”, etc. etc. And many planned. For example, the MiG-29M2/M3 (light-version of the MiG-35) and the SCRC “Bastion” with RCC “Yakhont” (partially delivered, partially in the process, but the contract has not been completed). Plus a lot of weapons from the Soviet era and is in excellent condition (for example, dozens of MiG-29), because Syria and the repair and modernization is also not spared.
And look at the actions of the UN – do not have time to make a resolution against Syria – Russia vetoed. As the saying goes, “feel the difference”.
So this is also a good example of that throwing Russia to anything good does not, but the friendship with Russia is a good guarantee.A lot of things.
And in itself worth a lot. And have it is worth it.”
Notice how this author raskladyvaem – back, 2011-m to year – the situation in Syria!
The article then became a hit. Even for this blogger’s interest in his article was unexpected. He wrote: “Frankly, very surprised that my comment is considered worthy and had already published as an article… Although I must admit, collected and analyzed information for some time. In principle, once the military issues me the closest :). And information thereon, including first owner, I have properly”.
Note also that, perhaps, it is parsed in the article on the details of the policy of Colonel Gaddafi has led to the fact that Russia abstained in the UN security Council…
Yes, the consequences were disastrous for Gaddafi. Yes, Sarkozy lied, promising Moscow only “no-fly zone”, but Moscow had reasons to “abstain” when voting.
The next day the NATO aggression turned into a betrayal of Russia and wiping NATO boots on the resolution of the UN security Council! Sarko – betrayed and lied – poteryal the favor of the Kremlin and flew then as President of France.
“Nothing on Earth passes without a trace…”
Sergey Filatov
