The past in China, the G-20 forum was interesting and significant not so much from the point of view of any significant actual results, which in principle was not, as from the position of manifestation of a new political reality. The reality in which the hegemony of the US in the past. The entire summit was as a clear benefit of the Chinese leader XI Jinping, who showed himself the new world leader who cared not only for the power and hegemony of their own country, but advocating for open and equal cooperation of all in the name of peace, stability and justice. Since this approach argue, at least publicly, it is hardly possible that such a position was doomed to success. Moreover, in addition to the words si invited to the summit enough guests from countries outside of the twenty, but which play an important role in the world, or at least the regions of their location. Primarily from Asia. In this sense, is very symbolic was the final trip of the guests of the summit on the lake. All in the same boat and President XI at the helm. In terms of the symbolism of China squeezed out of the summit.
At that meeting the G-20 initially it was stated as dedicated to the issues of the world economy, this same economy it was dedicated in fact to a lesser extent. Including because all current economic problems has long been firmly buried in political issues, but rather to the global discrepancy between the political ambitions of the leaders of the past economic realities. Because politics at the meetings were given much more attention. But as the economy decisions have not yet seen. In this respect, all the commentators focused not on the facts, and symbols, which in contrast to the facts on the forum was in excess.
The main attention of the whole world attracted very humiliating Obama. Although I have not seen anywhere a clear explanation of the real causes of embarrassment. But one thing that very few who tried to blame the incident China, speaks volumes. Indeed, China, with its commitment to rituals and traditions is extremely unusual for a clear and unprovoked humiliation of opponents, as if he did not belong to him. This, like the attempt to hush up the incident with the ladder and the carpet from the side of the Americans, suggests that their side was the actual culprit of the incident. I don’t know how it happened really, but I would venture to suggest the following. Americans are literally obsessed with two things – security and outright arrogance behaviour towards all other things. Most likely, when approaching the airport of air force 1 with the American President plane was asked to wait a bit for a worthy organization meetings, and at the same time to respect the queue of arriving guests. But wait, Americans are not accustomed, moreover, possible internal security protocols insisted on the speedy boarding. What is the actual Chinese took advantage of fully, fit giving, but no other related procedures. Another thing that cannot be ruled out that similar developments on the part of the Chinese could be expected. Americans in their simple-minded and blatant arrogance is often quite predictable guys. The subsequent sharp exchange of remarks and behavior of Chinese greeters quite frankly shows just how angry all of the incident they were. And this, again, suggests that they were only trying to save face in response to rudeness, and were not the initiators of the conflict. As for the phrase “This is our land and it’s our airport, it is literally following the example of our Lady is “cast in granite” and use every time you meet with the Americans anywhere. Maybe someday come?
Further developments at the summit was a worthy continuation of the meeting Obama at the airport. No, no one kicked and humiliated. Except that the President of the Philippines in the style of Vladimir Zhirinovsky slashed plain truth, giving the characteristics of Obama. Just no one singled out the US President as something special, that in itself was the most exquisite humiliation.
But a replica of the Philippine President should not be taken solely from an emotional point of view. This hint that leaving the Philippines under American influence and apparently begin to identify with China. For the Philippines it is quite pragmatic and deliberate step. But for US it is very late. All US attempts to influence the course of conflict in the South China sea was based on the formal protection of the interests of those of the Philippines as its ally in the region. And probably in her straightforward manner of offers of help so took the head of this country that he decided to comment publicly and in the form of a non-ambiguous interpretation.
Another symbolic moment of the summit was the first meeting between Putin and British Prime Minister. On the external side, it was emphasized that the British are so dissatisfied with the policy of Russia and weary of the need for a meeting with our President that even “forgot” about the formal greeting before beginning. However Putin will not catch, he unobtrusively straightened. From what is written the media the impression that Britain is meeting once again taught Russian life. But it if to forget about a few things. First, the meeting was held at the initiative of the UK. Secondly, the Prime Minister appeared at the meeting in the red outfit, which brings us to Kate along at the gala dinner on the occasion of the visit of si in London. And, of course, to Chinese color symbolism. So, apparently, the conversation and its interpretation for the media are very different things. Most likely, the British once again tried to push the official accession of Russia to their Alliance and global project and Putin, formally supporting the project, still prefers to remain a bit aloof from formal membership.
And how the things they say and do Russia and China, the impression is that Moscow’s position at least aligned with Beijing, and sometimes even is their common strategy. China itself is no longer able to distance themselves from the British project, the protagonist of which is. But to maintain a certain independence from Britain with the help of Russia do not mind. Rather it is vital. Si is not even restrained, writing in the colors of China’s interest in the comprehensive strategic partnership with Russia. That is still in our interests.
Of the major initiatives of our parties memorable phrase of Putin’s deoffshorization of the world economy. Subject to share today on the US all saw this is anti-American attack. But the issue is much deeper. This statement on the impact on global corporations by States. And in the interests of States, including the United States itself. The application if it is supported by most of the countries, and most likely it will lead to the total ruin of the largest corporations, and the funds will become the property of state and will be used for mutual jointing of accumulated debt. In this regard, the position of the US as the largest offshore and the world’s largest debtor curious. Elimination of offshore will allow the US to instantly fill the budget huge sums of money and to pay most of the debts to creditors. All of the others are silent, countries such as Russia, China and many would be net a huge win. Even Europe will be a big plus, enabling it if not to run away, to crawl away from the precipice.
But in order to decide on such global changes need a common determination and a common will. Among those who potentially loses is Britain. Its financial power associated with offshore pretty tight. But the British as competent strategists for over a decade consistently withdraw capital out of the shadows, and even deliberately demolish your own offoshornoy zone. In fact, on the side of corporations from large countries remain alone in the United States in the face of the Rockefellers, the Clintons. If “Wicked” will win, the world probably expects a series of major conflicts from the corporate and the local to the global war of annihilation. Two winners in this fight can not be, or global corporations will finally break the sovereignty of States and the world will become a global market in which corporate policies and profits are more important than government regulations and laws, and plunder of the planet will continue until complete exhaustion of resources or the state will take revenge and regain all that was stolen from them by corporations over the past two centuries. While the development of the situation says that the rematch will take place.
It understands and the American elite, because, while continuing the struggle, she’s already looking for a place with alternative developments. In particular coup in Brazil and the coming to power of the protege of the USA is nothing more than an attempt to be elitist, now emerging in the BRICS format. Not coincidentally summit-20 began with the informal BRICS forum.
The de-offshorization of the world economy will mean the following. A huge amount of capital just burn at the same time burning the corresponding amount of debt. The latter will multiply more. Today, when talking about the fact that gold can not play the role of money, because the last lot, and a little gold, forget about the fact that most of the money will be destroyed by the termination and liquidation of the reciprocal of the debt burden. And that the mass, which will remain, it will match total world gold reserves. Moreover, for the world is almost not as important where it finds “trouble” rushing through the world capitals, the United States, in the homeland (country of origin) or anywhere else. In any case, through tax exemptions, the situation in the world dramatically improve their health. Yes, for a substantial time in the world will be much less than the mass of commodities, although the transition will be mitigated huge current reserves. Yes, will change drastically the prices of all goods and services, as well as the correlation between most of them. But for the first time in many decades the mass of commodities will come into line with the currency and wealth of the States will be determined not by debt and consumption, and production and reserves.
With surprise I saw online a lot of moaning about the fact that Ukraine at the summit was not invited. The offense that once again Ukraine has bet on the wrong horse, and even in the last moment before its fall, can understand. But the surprise is the fact that China was invited only those countries which have real sovereignty, their own opinions on the future and some credibility in the world or their regions, nothing. It’s only natural. You just have to be among them for the same indication, not in fact the presence of the formal state attributes and symbols. Yes, about Ukraine at the summit probably told even in her absence, because to speak only with those who have to do with anything. Even though these conversations almost certainly happened according to the formula:
– Volodya, ask what you want, just take back the Ukraine. No more strength to endure her whining and begging.
– Fig, Fig, gentlemen. You made that mess, you can deal with it to the end.
In General, the tone of the statements and the results of numerous multilateral meetings and bilateral negotiations at the summit speaks for the fact that at least the outer side of the English draft of the future characterized by collective responsibility, division of zones of influence, the formation of a new global financial system, and the concentration of economic activity in the Pacific region, adopted by most countries. And this majority is less concerned with the problems of those who still do not agree and held for the elusive greatness of the past. But in reality, already escaped. That is, the world has chosen peace, not war. War is still possible, but each day and each consolidated movement of the majority, who chose the world, make it less likely.
