The “new” EU policy: suicide for the United States. Grigory Ignatov
Publication date: 13 October 2016, 19:15
New anti-Russian EU sanctions play into the hands of America in the strangulation of his ally-rival. Europe unleashed on us, so she broke off about Russia teeth
Oh, and not just our President to work with these strange people…
Joke about mice and a cactus, which they had to eat through the pain, is the first Association that comes to mind when news about the EU’s intentions to impose new sanctions against Russia.
“In the near future the EU leaders will discuss new sanctions against Russia because of the situation in Syria. According to The Wall Street Journal, citing European diplomats. According to interlocutors of the edition, specific decisions about what will be new anti-Russian sanctions yet. Most likely, restrictions will apply to Russian officials who can Fund the current EU list. It is assumed that the EU would discuss imposing new sanctions on October 17. According to the WSJ, on Saturday, the U.S. Secretary of state John Kerry plans to meet with Minister of foreign Affairs of Russia Sergey Lavrov to discuss the situation in Syria, and then travel to London for talks with European officials.”
Here draw attention to two things.
The first is “specific decisions about what will be new anti-Russian sanctions yet”: that is to say, the decision was made in a hurry, hastily, in haste, and there is no balanced strategy, it is not necessary. “Well, do it, do it soon something!!”.
The second (explaining first) – “John Kerry plans to meet with Minister of foreign Affairs of Russia Sergey Lavrov to discuss the situation in Syria, and then travel to London for talks with European officials”: that Mr. Kerry and tell in London (by the way, why London? but what about Brexit?), as the Europeans to act correctly. Will bring, so to say, the package instructions.
I’ll even venture to suggest that the order of the meeting here is also important: first, Kerry would try to scare Lavrov “terrible European anger”, which will include almost a rupture of diplomatic relations, and then leaving Europe: “I was there the Russian has promised, what will you do, if you please to perform.”
What can you say about this. Again, two things.
First: Russia is deliberately marginalizing in terms of a total ban on intervention in any important node of world politics. “Not by Senka cap”, “no you will understand.” Syria is an example of how Russia tried to solve the issues of their own (their own!) security by combating terrorism outside its borders – global in General practice today. But we hit on the hand: no way, no way! Everything is possible – you can’t. It is, of course, it’s not in “the tears of a child from Aleppo” — set the operation to prosecute the terrorists somewhere in Chad, and Chad for sanctions was announced.
The behavior of Europe, at least, strange: Russia is fighting Islamic radicals, which affect most of the EU. The attacks come mainly in evropke happen, not in USA. And so as not to interfere with the terrorists to evolve, the EU wants okorotit Russia. Strange logic.
Second, the introduction of a new round of sanctions puts an end to détente in the relations between Russia and Europe. First and foremost, it means that the Russian sanctions against European companies will not be removed. But there have repeatedly stated that they suffer billions of dollars in losses from political squabbles, and the efforts of Europe for the “boosting” of Ukraine to close the issue with the Donbas and the mutual sanctions – very eloquent. And so, when Kiev already almost “doget”, and the Russian money that’s going back into the European economy – in someone’s head is born the mysterious “wonderful” idea: Hey, Hey, Hey, let’s declare Russia new sanctions for Syria! Show must go on!
The answer, I think, is simple: “it’s not gave me 15 days, it gave US 15 days,” as in “the Adventures of Shurik”. In the sense that the United States is extremely beneficial not only weaken Russia, but also symmetrical weakening of Europe. In this aspect, a two-year “sanction marathon” was no less anti-European than anti-Russian.
Let me remind you the abstracts of our recent material on the efforts of America to bring down the system pillars of the European economy – in particular, the “Deutsche Bank”. “What makes them hysterical, to hurry, to run over the heads of longtime allies, trying to drown them? Why the urgent need to bring down the European economy so urgently away from someone (no matter who) hundreds of billions? Is it because the us economy itself is on the verge of collapse?”.
New anti-Russian EU sanctions play into the hands of America in the strangulation of his ally-rival. Europe unleashed on us, so she broke off about Russia teeth, and then got another “Marshall plan”, finally losing the remnants of sovereignty – this time economic. That once again confirms the became dependent politically, it is impossible to remain economically independent.
Grigory Ignatov, “Journalistic truth”
