In late September, Deputy Minister of construction Andrey Chibis told the media that citizens can save on utility bills up to 30% of the funds after their homes will be carried out energy efficient repairs.
But its implementation is required to significantly increase matching contributions to the payment documents. If now the national average, according to the official, the monthly fee for the overhaul fluctuates at around 6 rubles per square meter, it is necessary to raise it to 20-50 rubles. We are talking about almost a ten-fold growth rate!
Taking into account the fact that the issue of energy efficiency of apartment buildings has long haunted the representatives of the Ministry Mikhail men, “SP” decided to ask the experts whether it applies at all, the concept of “energy-efficient overhaul” to “brezhnevka”, “Khrushchev” and a two-story wooden barracks, which are in the province make up the majority of the existing housing stock? How difficult is it (possible to do) technically to convert the old five – or chetyrehetazhku the latest technology?
— It is possible! — said Andrey Kuznetsov, the General Director is a member of the Moscow chamber of Commerce and industry of the management company “MATORIN”. — Have experience of the Baltic countries on the subject. However, for heat they pay much more than us. And no ultimate standards of consumers do not protect, how much to spend — and so pay.
“SP”: — But if the majority of resources going on in the external engineering communications, what’s the point in carrying out such repair? For example, the calculation of the same heating is performed on the basis of the testimony of General house metering device that is installed at the entrance to the apartment building?
— Energy efficiency will need to improve on all parts: and on the track, and in the house.
“SP”: — Describing the delights of the future economy, Andrey Chibis cited the example individual heater for high-rise buildings. Some even develop and the device will really help residents to save money? For example, on water consumption, ONE for the porches?
Mainly savings to be sought in the rational use of heat (insulation of facades and installation of smart automation in ITP) and energy consumption (led lighting, motion sensors and so on). Water while you can save money just by eliminating leaks.
“SP”: — whether collected through the payment for the repair funds are insufficient to make it “energy efficient” version without increasing the rate, say, in Moscow or the Moscow region?
— Yes, indeed, even in Moscow now funds enough to restore worn-out systems and structural elements, a significant upgrade that is not enough. And in the regions especially.
“SP”: — the Ministry of construction has promised that before the end of the year will issue recommendations to the owners for acceptance of the results of the overhaul and gave an example: the inspection density interpanel seams should be checked with the help of a plastic card, with good quality it should go inside the joint for no more than 30% of its length. Is it possible to check the quality in such a simple way? How the recommendation conforms to the standards of quality of filling of interpanel joints? But the occupants of the house, the vast majority do not have special knowledge in construction, very easy to cheat, isn’t it?
— Of course, acceptance of the need to implement a specialized enterprise engaged in the technical supervision in the construction. Traditional methods are ineffective and will not find wide application, in my opinion.
“SP”: — Andrei Chibis said that the decision to increase the fee for major repairs, the owners must make to the General Assembly, to force them, no one is going. How do you assess the probability of a voluntary intention to pay a higher fee for “energy-efficient overhaul” this innovation will become the basic “obligation” for everyone? Especially considering that the facts of falsification of results of the voting residents continue to take place.
— I will, until the desire to spend now to save later will not accept the owner, and official. But the Ministry, I believe, is doing it out of despair, guided by the philosophy: once the owner does not want to do anything for their own benefit, it is necessary to force to do so good.
“SP”: — And whether, by the way, the likelihood that existing fees will not go up “just so” as it happens, in principle, with all tariffs? Given the fact that it is now allowed to place balances on overhaul at Bank deposits at interest, where is the guarantee that it will not Wake the appetites of reoperation, and then the payments and without energy efficiency will increase significantly?
— Everything will depend on the degree of freedom, which will give operators the Ministry of construction.
“SP”: — the Ministry says that the amendments will make the capital repair programme more transparent. Is there a way to do this without affecting residents generally at the state level? And if so, why not used?
— Unfortunately, your property should be the owner. The state has nothing to do with. The meaning of the housing Code, the owner himself has to decide when, how and what to spend to live comfortably and safely. But in practice nobody does it. The owners of the perceive payments for utility services like taxes, and therefore the smaller they are, the better. And then, when the house begins to fall apart, the tenants are beginning to require the state to intervene to help them. Our “good” government is tired to be doing this out of altruism, and decided all owners be required to chip in for the repair. And now decided that it is possible to fold and energy efficient construction.
Personally, I believe this is only effective measures that will educate the owners of the understanding: everyone is responsible for their property itself, and not parasitic on the weakness of the state. Another thing is that if the owners are also passive and will participate in the expenditure of funds for the repair, directly on these purposes will go from strength to half of the funds raised, the rest is “cut” by doing works on paper.
