Author Stepan Stepanovich Sulakshin — General Director of Center for scientific political thought and ideology, doctor of political.N., D. Phys.-math.N., Professor.
Today, the actual question on which I would draw your attention to is the plans of the Ministry of economic development Ulyukayev, consider the Government Medvedev and President Putin to freeze wages in the country.
Well, it would seem, the crisis. Like reasonable things people say: “Freeze salaries — release resources profit in the balance sheet of companies, enterprises, corporations and direct them into investments”. So they say. Well, firstly, disingenuous. Anything and anywhere they will not send, and now I will prove it. Secondly, the actual diagnosis, scientific responsible diagnosis suggests that these people are preparing a revolution in the country, the real social revolution with shocks, with violations of the law. The fifth column.
In fact, the Government, their supervisor, the President — this fifth column in a country which is preparing the country for revolution. Make this statement as a reconstruction of their actions. The FSB should somehow relate to this statement, at least to study it and check the argument. Of course, the fact may be inferred from stupidity and illiteracy, and perhaps because of conscious actions. But is it a big difference if they are dealing illegal shock of the country?
<blockquote>
You become uncomfortable and scared of these words? Do you think that I go overboard and make unfounded conclusions and predictions? And I was very scared. But let’s face it. First, about investment sentiment among these three agents of power — the President, Government and Ministry of economic development has long been well known. State budget investments and they reduce. They have become ridiculous. Continue, as evidenced by Medvedev’s anti-crisis plan, to rely on foreign investments, and it is in terms of sanctions, the blockade of the country and it is quite clear already, of the project “geopolitical recycling” not only President Putin, but our entire country. Such nonsense continues in the minds of the liberals in the Government to flourish.
</blockquote>
Secondly, in macrobalance enterprises, macrobalance our country (the book “Macrobalance as reality and the tool you http://rusrand.ru/library/monographs/makrobalans-strany-kak-instrument-i-realnost” rel=”nofollow”>find online www.rusrand.ru under the button http://rusrand.ru/library” rel=”nofollow”>”Library”) is very clearly seen that 16%, which the owners assigned, and the “owners” of public corporations, oil and gas, natural monopolies, which seems to state, but implicitly privatized, they have appropriated not for investment. For output in offshore and luxury consumption. (Fig. 1)
Fig. 1. Compare macrobalance different models of Russia, calculation of the authors(bars represent the ratio between these three parameters, and the numerical values correspond to the fraction of the parameter in macrobalance)(Source: “Macrobalance as a reality and a tool”, p. 90, Fig. 35)
Why privatized? Just because the order came: “to Give to the state budget profit you get!”. You state Corporation! The owner — the state — to give a profit! Still gave 10-15%, not more. Now it seems to be in a crisis, the hole in the budget. Don’t know what to do, how to handle it, and correct it — “Give the profit!”. But don’t give up. Rosneft has already knocked off yourself this standard. Gazprom is struggling to pay of this standard. The Central Bank also continues a portion of the profits to spread out actually in their pockets of the owner.
Relative investment of the private owner. So he invested in development, this should be beneficial to him. For example, it should not be hapki, a strategist, thinking about the development of his case for 30 years. Show me one such? Including the power of verhovodova. The benefits for private owners can be done by gosudarstvom subsidiary and fiscal ways. Either way, ranging from real-Kudrin economic policy of the Government and the President is not per milligram, absolutely not. And therefore, the volume of investments in the country to gross domestic product is minimal. It is a steady “achievement” mode, the achievement of “United Russia”, which, http://rusrand.ru/library/proceedings/politiko-matematicheskij-analiz-vyborov” rel=”nofollow”>stealing in 2011, voices and climbing in the state Duma, 5 years sitting on the neck of the country.
The achievement is as follows. If China is 46% of GDP goes to investment, go to development, then we have less than 17-18% according to official data, and even less real. They are not going to develop. They are not going to encourage investment in the development, import substitution. Therefore, the promise to send money from the reduced salaries for investment — it is wickedness. The purpose of the other. To plug the hole in the budget. All. Ie, to consume. And then what? They don’t think about it. Because investment falls.
But what they really intend, and it is necessary to believe? It will definitely be. First, real wages have already fallen in 2015 at 10% and continue to fall with the rate of about prosentase a month. And they say: “freeze salaries”. Pensions, they have actually frozen. From the funded part of the budget of the pension money of the pensioners seized and sanitize Vnesheconombank, which became bankrupt because of Olympic toys Mr Putin. But wages by this logic, they really are going to freeze.
But these people do not know many things. They do not know, for example, such things as work http://rusrand.ru/library/monographs/gosudarstvennoe-upravlenie-v-rossii-i-trud-oplata-motivatsija-proizvoditelnost” rel=”nofollow”>”Public administration in Russia and work”. Work and all is created in our country. From the level of wages the productivity of workers in Russia depends on an abrupt manner. (Fig. 2)
Fig. 2. The expert evaluated the comparative curves of motivation to productive work. 1 — Russia; 2 — USA; 3 — Europe; 4 — China (Source: http://rusrand.ru/library/monographs/gosudarstvennoe-upravlenie-v-rossii-i-trud-oplata-motivatsija-proizvoditelnost” rel=”nofollow”>”Public administration in Russia and work”, p. 45, Fig. 1.2.16)
Now we are at a subthreshold level salaries are about 40-50 thousand rubles per month. They did not want to raise (you want to freeze!) wages in the same macro balance, because they are very concerned about the income of owners, not wage. Flat income rate proves that the subject of their concern is their own income and preferences for wealth.
<blockquote>
Wages have underestimated, understated not at the percentages, and many tens of percent relative to world standards. Wages in Russia, that is output per 1 ruble of the wages, that is, the exploitation of human labor in Russia, by tens of percent higher than in comparable countries. That is, for that fight, for that the revolution of 1991 happened, for now the applause and the ratings of Putin presents the people. For it? For his exploit in the tail and mane? So they are not going to cross the threshold wage. Which begins after the abrupt increase in productivity. Great the Owner is not interested in the development of Russia. And he’s a very smart uncle. Therefore, they controlled the entire fifth column operates exactly as valid. But the situation is even more dangerous.
</blockquote>
What do they actually do? The history of our country and other countries http://rusrand.ru/library/monographs/gosudarstvennoe-upravlenie-v-rossii-i-trud-oplata-motivatsija-proizvoditelnost” rel=”nofollow”>shows that if wages lagging behind labour productivity, that is, increasing the ratio of exploitation of the working man, there is a social revolution. For example, in the period between 1885 to 1920, occurred the socialist revolution. (Fig. 3)
Fig. 3. The ratio of wage growth and productivity in the history of Russia in the period 1885-1920. 1 — wage growth, 2 — growth of labor productivity, 1887 — 100% (Istochnik:http://rusrand.ru/library/monographs/gosudarstvennoe-upravlenie-v-rossii-i-trud-oplata-motivatsija-proizvoditelnost” rel=”nofollow”>”Public administration in Russia and work”, P. 199, Fig. 3.4.1.a)
What happened? Increased the degree of exploitation of working people — will get a revolution.
Further, when came the Bolsheviks established Soviet power, wages and output have behaved well. They behaved synchronously. It’s up to 1926. (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4. The ratio of wage growth and productivity in the history of Russia in the period 1921-1926 gg. 1 — wage growth, 2 — growth of labor productivity, 1913 — 100% (Istochnik:http://rusrand.ru/library/monographs/gosudarstvennoe-upravlenie-v-rossii-i-trud-oplata-motivatsija-proizvoditelnost” rel=”nofollow”>”Public administration in Russia and work”, P. 199, Fig. 3.4.1.b)
From 1927 to 1941 the salaries outpaced production! (Fig. 5)
Fig. 5. The ratio of wage growth and productivity in the history of Russia in the period 1927-1941. 1 — wage growth, 2 — growth of labour productivity, 1928 — 100% (Istochnik:http://rusrand.ru/library/monographs/gosudarstvennoe-upravlenie-v-rossii-i-trud-oplata-motivatsija-proizvoditelnost” rel=”nofollow”>”Public administration in Russia and work”, P. 200, Fig. 3.4.1.in)
It was a tremendous incentive, when there was industrialization, the restructuring of the economy of the country, to prepare and managed to win a Great Victory in a difficult war. The highest growth rates were.
In China the same proportion and rate of development. (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6. Wage growth and labour productivity in China (1995 — 100%). 1 — wages 2 — labour productivity growth (Source: http://rusrand.ru/library/monographs/gosudarstvennoe-upravlenie-v-rossii-i-trud-oplata-motivatsija-proizvoditelnost” rel=”nofollow”>”Public administration in Russia and work”, p. 204, Fig. 3.4.4)
Did you catch it? Wages are higher in output, the pace of development. The salary is lower in output stagnation. So why do today’s liberals №5 (almost like Chanel No. 5) are going to cut salaries?
Look again http://rusrand.ru/library/monographs/gosudarstvennoe-upravlenie-v-rossii-i-trud-oplata-motivatsija-proizvoditelnost” rel=”nofollow”>the story. That’s what happened between 1960 and 1990. This is the Khrushchev, Brezhnev and all pomershimi elders. Wages again began to lag behind productivity. (Fig. 7).
Fig. 7. The ratio of wage growth and productivity in the history of Russia in the period 1960-1990 1 — wages 2 — labour productivity growth, 1959 — 100% (Istochnik:http://rusrand.ru/library/monographs/gosudarstvennoe-upravlenie-v-rossii-i-trud-oplata-motivatsija-proizvoditelnost” rel=”nofollow”>”Public administration in Russia and work”, P. 200, Fig. 3.4.1.g)
What was the result? — Right! 1991. Revolution. The country is again defeated.
Here’s the first revolution of 1917 in this type of plug wages and exploitation. Here’s the second revolution of 1991 in the same fork. But the new authorities ‘ intention to freeze wages. They make a new plug.
What they do as a result? As a result, they prepared a social revolution in the country. A very smart uncle, who, apparently, read our books and in real laboratories overseas owners of the fifth column in our country, apparently, such a plan had formed — to bring the country to revolution, to independence, to turn it into a boiling pot and in this situation to ruin it. Here’s a prediction I make. And it stemmed not only from these dannym, about other data about other independent forecasts, we’ll talk.
Friends! It is necessary to understand what they are doing with us and with our country leaders of the country, all three levels — the President, the Government and all these lab — “the Tower”, Ranchise Gaidar and other institutions that are under the control Ulyukayev, a former aide to Gaidar, is actually preparing a pogrom of our country. The authorities are preparing a pogrom of our country.
You have to understand that and who are preparing in our country.
