Source: chervonec-001
Some abstracts (video below) Ryzhkov expressed:
a) Sanctions are a huge blow to our economy. The reason of sanctions — Crimea.
b) Western Investment and no money.
C) Russia (allegedly) violated international law.
g) Bridge in Yakutsk is built.
Oh, Ryzhkov Ryzhkov. So many years in politics RUB, the most basic political and geopolitical issues to catch not learned. But if not learned, then why vote for you?
So, go through his thesis.
a) there would be No sanctions for the Crimea, it would be for nothing.
No matter what — Magnitsky, Puxi rayot, gays, the movement of Russian troops inside the borders, for supporting Assad. But it would have been.
But the development of import substitution would not be. And it is actively developing.
You know, like Homo sapiens appeared for the glacial period (food and blood had to produce, not sitting on the tree, to tear the bananas), and now, the economy is mobilized, tightened the nut, removes bottlenecks and dependence. Otherwise you would still lived “so well.”
b) Well, no, and no Western loans.
It is clear that without an infusion of money is problematic. But better
— live within your means
less to keep in the us securities
— not to sit on a credit needle, when the ever pay interest (I give the bulk of the profits) to Western banks, perekreditovanija once again the body of principal. The main thing now is to give Western loans typed entities and enterprises/organizations in Russia that safely and done.
in) Ryzhkov? What is the violation?
Crimea at the time of infusion of the Russian Federation was de facto and de jure independent from Ukraine. Kosovo without referendum went. And the West loves case law.
g) the Bridge in Yakutia? Well, it’s somewhere Ryzhkov rights.
But. And there is more the government’s priorities just shifted.
Firstly, the necessity of the Kerch bridge is already ripe and overripe. Just “Nenka square” all the time torpedoed the project for decades. Now the bridge will be.
Second, despite the significance of the region, with 300 thousand population of Yakutsk and 2.5 million population of the Crimea is rasnoveana category.
Built, albeit late by a few years. The bridge is not going anywhere, and after the construction of the bridge in the Crimea all the forces transferred to the construction of a bridge across the Lena. Which, incidentally, will be much more modest in scale Kerch.
And most importantly:
d) geopolitical importance of the Crimea.
What has led to?:
— victory svidomizma
— leaving without the protection of the Russian population in Crimea, which no doubt would come to pacify the illegal and illegitimate Kiev junta
— the displacement of the black sea fleet from the Crimea,
— the appearance of NATO bases in the Crimea
And would lead to irreparable damage to the reputation and defense capability of the country.
There is no amount of money would be impossible to measure. NATO would firmly and finally clung to the throat of Russia. And a move would be impossible
The defeat of Russia in Syria (albeit theoretically possible) would be carried to Russia a hundred times smaller costs than the Pro-NATO Crimea.
Silly comrade Ryzhkov such basic things are not understood. I would never vote, not even appreciating his past.
I think others, too, are unlikely to vote.
