Home / Policy / Ordinary fascism. Or iskluchitelno islyuchitelno

Ordinary fascism. Or iskluchitelno islyuchitelno

In recent years we often hear about the exceptionalism of Americans. Thus, in justification of the correctness of this thesis provides a variety of evidence, including statistics, policy and Economics. Even Obama is a pale shadow of the once great leaders of the United States, recently said something awkward in his study. Say, after calling him, not Putin or XI took XI’s when you have to solve some international problem.

It. Not even going to challenge. Because really who else to call than someone who formally leads the Empire, unleashed in the world all the conflicts and created all of the international problems of global society in the last 25-30 years.
I do not intend to discuss today how it has been created by the United States as they have evolved and matured, developing into other people’s bones in the only superpower of today. It is known today only by Americans, and the population of the vassals, who by inertia call yourself civilized world. Well, guys from North Africa and the Middle East in recent days, headed for a forced sobriety and poumnenie of the population of Europe. Take some time and the Europeans realize that today, they are one could call them that are to blame for the fact that believing in pseudodual, imposed on them by the ruling behind the scenes, tolerant we lost your country…

Well, not about this today…
I really don’t want to discuss complex development of the nation, which was formed in North America as a result of work of a “melting pot”, as some say, and has created a state of the United States. It is. At the end of the 20th century, it is today the only superpower, the well-known classification, proposed in 1944, the year William Fox, supported by Mao Zedong and various Brzezinski and Coen.
USA only since the beginning of the 80 countries have satellites vassals at the head of them. Only the us have a huge global network of military bases. Coupled with nuclear capabilities, a strong economy and capital that gives them the right to such a great status.

But whether it is equivalent to uniqueness?
In my opinion – no. Let there ever any of the leaders of the USSR, who was also a superpower, such a statement? No. Why? Because such statements bad smell.
It is FASCISM. And in the Soviet Union remember well the grief that brought the peoples of the theory of domination of one nation over others. Another thing is the population of the United States. They live in the state, which in this war have made their deal. It raised the economy on military orders, concentrated in its hands all the world’s gold reserves, tied to the private ownership of the fed – in green wrappers all world currencies, as the only backup. But because the population did not feel on their skin all the “charms” of fascism that survived European countries, including those Nations, that they themselves preached this exclusivity may not have historical immunity to such cannibalistic thought.
If someone thinks I’m wrong in calling that an American pesticideresistant calls exclusivity, let’s examine the terminology and some definitions of fascism.

“Fascism is the open terrorist dictatorship of the most reactionary, most chauvinistic, most imperialist elements of Finance capital… Fascism is not transcending class power and not the power of the petty bourgeoisie or the lumpenproletariat over financial capital. Fascism is the power of financial capital. It is the organization of terrorist reprisals against the working class and the revolutionary section of the peasantry and the intelligentsia. Fascism in foreign policy is chauvinism in its crudest form, cultivating Zoological hatred of other peoples.”

Georgi Dimitrov.

You have to understand that Dimitrov gave this definition from the point of view of a Communist, Marxist-Leninist. He could not upomyanut of the class struggle. But in terms of determining the foreign policy of fascism, his definition is very modern and relevant.

“Fascism is the dictatorship of the nationalists. Accordingly, a fascist is a person who professes (and preach) the superiority of one nation over the other and active advocate of the “iron hand”, “discipline order”, “iron fist” and other delights of totalitarianism.
And that’s all. Nothing more at the heart of fascism there. Dictatorship plus nationalism. Totalitarian rule of one nation. But everything else – the secret police, camps, bonfires of books, war grows out of this poisonous grain, as the death of the cancer cells.
Possible iron dictatorship with all its deathly charms of, say, the dictatorship of Stroessner in Paraguay or the dictatorship of Stalin in the USSR, but since the total idea of this dictatorship is not the idea of a national (racial), it is not fascism. It is possible to state, based on the national idea, say Israel, but if there is no dictatorship (“iron hand”, the suppression of democratic freedoms, the omnipotence of the secret police), it is not fascism”

Boris Strugatsky.

It’s all about us…. And here the exclusivity of the Americans and the war with the aim of restoring world order, and Guantanamo and other prisons of U.S. intelligence. Here and distribution of the domestic law of the overseas fascist powers in the whole world, theft and conviction of foreign nationals.

And finally the definition given by academics – “Fascism is an ideology and practice asserting the superiority and exclusiveness of a particular nation or race and aimed at inciting national intolerance, justification of discrimination towards representatives of other peoples,… “

No comment. All about the United States of North America. So, human who calls himself the President of the United States, when he speaks of its exclusiveness. But not telling just what all he preaches is ORDINARY FASCISM.

Why are Europeans silent? Yes, because ordinary Europeans today are so keen on the new idea of tolerance towards other Nations and nontraditional forms of relationships between men, women, children, their clothes, animals and corpses that they have no time to pay attention to the “little things” about the exclusivity and dominance of their overseas partners. They would now understand who is today “the parent number one and number two.”
And the great politicians in Europe do not exist today. The last one was Schroeder and Berlusconi. They still had an opinion different from the American one. Today there are none. Although Frau face of good grandmother, also occasionally expresses his personal opinion. However the next day, after a telephone conversation with the overseas party Committee, it turns out that she’s with him strongly disagree.

But why the silence of China and Russia? More precisely, why can’t leadership?
Actually neither ours nor the Chinese, the manual is not silent. But they don’t call a spade a spade, I think, only for the reason that this will lead not to a hybrid or the cold war. Such statements simply require that ALL rulers of ALL countries to respond and take a clear position. And this will inevitably lead to military escalation and already hot military conflict.
Well, what is a military conflict between the us, Russia and China, with reference there in Europe, Asia and North Africa – it is obvious to everyone. It is a global catastrophe.

Yeah I mean the politicians. God is with them. They hands and feet tied to the knowledge of the situation that is available to us.
But we didn’t have anything to do with them. And we should not be afraid to call a spade not only the Ukrainian authorities but also their ideological inspirers. If a kept woman is a fascist, it is logical to call you a fascist, one who allocates her existence. Moreover, he is not ashamed to admit it. It is for this reason I often call the us fascist Empire of lies. I urge everyone who is aware of what is happening and share my opinion to join. I think it’s time to call a spade a spade. It might be too late.
   

Check Also

The UN’s ‘unofficial man’

Raphael Lemkin, a stateless Jewish refugee who died penniless, gave mankind’s greatest crime its name. …