Home / Policy / Independence, which is not

Independence, which is not

Независимость, которой нет

This year in the territories of the former state will celebrate a birthday – independence day. Independence, I must say, came quite strange. At first, the “independent” was selling everything he could – or rather, all that were buyers. Then, when liquid things became less independent of steel to borrow.

At interest (officially) and secured their own territory (unofficially). More than take loans, the word, the louder the screaming of their own exclusivity and independence.

Over time, Ukraine became independent from its own industrial base, the descendants of Bandera, who fled to Canada, their “research” to make Ukraine independent from his own true story, replacing it with a delusional fiction about ancient ukrov, American management eventually made Ukraine independent from its own sovereignty, and the requirements of the IMF made the most of Ukrainians are independent from their own cash savings.

Russophobic policy of Kiev, after an armed coup in February 2014, made Ukraine independent from the Crimea, returning home and military aggression to make Ukraine independent from the Donbass partially now and fully in the short term.

The crisis in the power generating region particularly enhances the perception of Ukrainian independence, bringing it to a new level – vyklyanchivaniya coal from the NPT and supply of electricity from Russia, from which Ukraine is defiantly trying to become independent, accusing actually invented by Ukrainian junta aggression.

It would be interesting to hear the opinion of Ukrainians, there in independence existence?

Justified pathetic dreams 1991 “now out of the “safka”, stop all feed from the last forces, and begin to live not worse than in France”?

sergs_inf

Check Also

The UN’s ‘unofficial man’

Raphael Lemkin, a stateless Jewish refugee who died penniless, gave mankind’s greatest crime its name. …