Officials say they do not have to check the ground before hand.
In Chelyabinsk, a large family fifty two years unsuccessfully trying to get the administration to replace them free land, suitable for building houses.
As the correspondent of NDNews.ru in 2014, about 50 large Chelyabinsk families in accordance with the decree of the Russian President and the regional law from 2011 got free land for individual housing construction.
The sections cut on the edge of Leninsky district, the village Selmash. Family took them in the winter. And when I visited there in the warmer time of the year, was horrified: the whole area is a swamp with reeds taller than a man. Access roads and municipal infrastructure – a prerequisite in the allocation of land to large families – do not exist.
Construction in this territory is possible only after carrying out of works for the drainage of land and the raising of the ground, which cost millions of rubles. Of course, that kind of money from a large no.
More than two years Chelyabinsk trying to achieve from the administration of Chelyabinsk replacement swamp lands, but to date the case has not moved forward. The owners received replies, and in December 2015 in response to numerous failures” from granted land city Council approved a new procedure of formation of plots. According to the document the citizen refused to land because of the impossibility there of any construction, again accepted on the account with the date and time the initial queued. Now the owners of the land on the marsh just suggesting to abandon it. However, for re-registration you must re-collect the certificate confirming the status of large families and the neediness of the family. And during the litigation with officials of the older children in some of the family reached adulthood, and the status of a large was lost.
A number of the family, refused to land and confirm their status, still have not received the new parcels.
It is noteworthy that the Chelyabinsk officials refuse to take responsibility for the allocation of the land.
Thus, the Committee on management of property and land relations explains that until December 2015 free areas formed the main Department of architecture and urban planning. QUITO is engaged in cadastral works and staging of land on the cadastral registration. “However, a preliminary examination of the land plots, information about the formation which is presented to the Committee GUAY, Land code, law №121-ZO, order No. 26/5 not required”, – say representatives of the Committee for property and land relations.
According to them, according to the Department of urban planning areas were fit for purpose, i.e. suitable for construction of residential houses and waterlogged areas were absent.
However, the owners of the swamp refute it. So, in response the main Department of architecture and building of administration of October 09, 2015 reported that in the submissions on justification of the project planning area… according to the criteria of typification of podtablemodel the studied area belongs to district I-B-1 – flooded in anthropogenically modified conditions with a high groundwater level”. At the same time, according to the Cumulative rules for engineering surveys for construction adopted by the state construction Committee of Russia in 2000, phases I-B-1 corresponds to the constantly podtopleny the result of long-term anthropogenic impacts. In such areas the depth than the average annual position of the groundwater level is equal to or above the depth of the critical level.
Immediately after the discovery of problems owners have written the application in office of public Prosecutor of Chelyabinsk. The Supervisory authority has established the fact of violation.
“The results of the Prosecutor’s office to the head of administration of Chelyabinsk brought representation with the requirement about elimination of violations of the law and with the requirement for education of the land on which accommodation real estate, that would not prevent a rational use of land and not violate the rights of citizens. This view of the administration is not performed,” say the owners.
Recently the family sent a follow-up statement to the Prosecutor. It is under consideration.
