Our Western friends and partners have included treatment of hysteria. Trying to force Russia to repent for unknown shot down over the territory of Ukraine “Boeing” need to immediately stop bombing the terrorists in Syria. Robbie Williams has released a mocking video about Russian.
Baiting is in full swing. The representative of the state Department of the USA John Kirby tried to even begin to threaten Russia with terrorist attacks and aircraft shot down:
https://lenta.ru/news/2016/09/29/kirby/
Later, however, he said he didn’t mean anything, but osadochek remains — it is implied that the terrorist attacks in Russian cities can make are the terrorists, whom Washington calls “moderate”, and which it actively defends in front of Russia:
http://ruslanostashko.livejournal.com/63015.html
We need this burst of sincerity, perhaps, at hand. Do not forget that, for example, the Pentagon chief Ashton Carter calls Russia the main threat to the United States and attention, the creative class emphasizes that it’s not in the person of Vladimir Putin, and Russia itself:
http://ruxpert.ru/Отношения_России_и_США
Recently Mr. Carter has made another statement about the readiness of the United States first to use nuclear weapons against Russia. Quoting the response to these threats from the Ministry of foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation:
http://www.mid.ru/ru/foreign_policy/news/-/asset_publisher/cKNonkJE02Bw/content/id/2478696
A major concern is the mention of a readiness to use its nuclear capability in the event of armed conflict with Russian participation in order to prevent our country the ability to use nuclear weapons to repel aggression.
It, apparently, is the position of the Military doctrine of the Russian Federation, according to which our country reserves the right to use such weapons when the very existence of the state is compromised as a result of aggression using conventional weapons. Again: the Doctrine speaks of aggression against Russia, not about some “failed aggression” on our part, as it delivers E. Carter. Such a blatant distortion of the Russian official document means that the American Minister or uses an incorrect translation, or picks a dangerous game.
By E. Carter it turns out that if Russia is attacked by the allies of the United States, Americans will be ready to support him and to threaten us with the use of its nuclear weapons. I would like to hope that Washington understands the meaning of such statements and their possible implications for international security and stability.
Remember, I wrote in 2013-2014, the Americans organized a “Evromaydan” will result in result in nuclear saber? Here it is, the Americans have already begun to threaten us with bombs.
Please note — we did not threaten Americans. We just bomb the terrorists in Syria, at the invitation of the legitimate government of Syria and with the full support of the Syrian people. However, these terrorists seem so important to US that Washington is ready to defend his protégé almost with nuclear arms.
What does all this mean for Russia? It might be worth following the example of Sergei Lukyanenko think there will be enough in which case shelters for every resident of the city?
http://dr-piliulkin.livejournal.com/800043.html
I think it’s too early to panic categorically. The actions of the US, then threaten, then take the threats back, then concluded a truce, then we break it means that the bickering within the American elite have already moved into the final phase. The clans are so busy fighting each other that the foreign policy of Washington did not remain forces. To Quote Ruslan Ostashko:
http://ruslanostashko.livejournal.com/62321.html
I can’t shake the feeling that everything is going American “hawks” in Syria is desperate. It’s like “professional foul” in football. Really to prevent Russia to implement its strategy in Syria, the Americans can not. Even the most ardent “hawks” of the us Senate a little afraid to declare war on Syria and Russia in order to establish Syria no-fly zone. And this fear was clearly visible at the meeting of the Senate Committee with the participation of the commander of the military group of the United States, who explained to the senators that simple solutions for the Americans in this conflict anymore.
What can they do in this situation? Only engage in provocations. Any provocation: military, political, diplomatic. Well, we have to react calmly, to demand to stop clowning and to bomb the terrorists accelerated pace. U.S. elections are very close.
Simply put, in the last month before the election, States are unlikely to doing anything global, and there they will have a new President, who some time will take the case of Barack Obama. If this month Bashar al-Assad will be able, for example, take Aleppo, the new President will, perhaps, only to record the defeat and carefully withdraw from Syria and Ukraine.
However, if the new President against expectations will be Mrs. Hillary Clinton, the stakes can be raised again — and then, I think, it is useful to know the address of the nearest bomb shelters. A direct attack on America, China or Russia is unlikely, but a terrorist attack using nuclear weapons is the dose of violence that the us military is under pressure from the Clinton clan may be solved.
