Home / Policy / Hillary Clinton was overly sympathetic to Russia

Hillary Clinton was overly sympathetic to Russia

Хиллари Клинтон проникалась симпатией к России

And again the USA. And again, pre-election vanity. This time we will focus on the Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton. This policy is already very sickly spoiled his reputation due to his dark past. It would seem that the dirt and “dirty linen” during this time was supposed to disappear, however, the Network appears more and more facts that in one way or another discrediting Clinton as a competent policy and empathetic leader.

This time American TV channel Fox News reported on a recent discovery related to the activities of Hillary Clinton. As it turned out, in 2010, when Clinton was still in the position of Secretary of state, she gave an interview to Vladimir Pozner. Discussed in the interview with Russian TV presenter was about Russia.

According to Hillary, the States never intended to weaken Russia. On the contrary. Their objectives were the strengthening of the Russian Federation. “We see a Russia with a strong culture with tremendous intellectual capital, which have Russia as the leader in the 21st century,” said Hillary Clinton in an interview with channel one.

Well, literally six years ago, U.S. Secretary of state believed that Russia needed a strong world power with an independent leader, and now, when it is her turn to lead the country, she spoke about the aggression of Russia, on the hard leader Vladimir Putin, and about the terrible politics, waged by the Russian authorities in spite of all the Western partners. Very literate move with her, do not say anything.

Despite all her indignation about the current relations of the Russian Federation and the United States, Clinton still managed to achieve their objectives: Russia has indeed become stronger.

Let’s see how this news will now react to residents of the state. I think some of them changed the idea of the Democratic candidate. Because whatever you say, and radically change their opinion or hide behind anger, not quite normal. However, what kind of normality can be involved if the whole election process in the US automatically equates to a Kook?

Check Also

The UN’s ‘unofficial man’

Raphael Lemkin, a stateless Jewish refugee who died penniless, gave mankind’s greatest crime its name. …