The collection of cars at the border crossing will introduce: the Minister of transport will say nothing. Fly with trains, “Aeroflot”.
“The issue of fees is examined as part of a shared integrated approach only with respect to vehicles, does not involve the charging of fees to individuals and is not a matter of the nearest future”.
That’s what I like in this phrase: so desire to sweeten the pill: “but not with individuals”. You can not physically, of course, they will pay and so: when you come into the store to buy suddenly and somehow more costly foreign goods. Although the phrase can be understood in another way: people will pay not for himself, but for his car.
But once and “Plato” was fantastic.
The Minister, by the way, said, why do I need this collection: no, not for the care of another Rothenberg, and to improve the quality of services at the border: ATM supply, pharmacy, hotel. That is now on private money, this can not be done, and is only to take away some more of the citizens (Hello inbound tourism, by the way) — and the border will bloom. Now tell me, Mr. Minister, why now not on the boundary of the ATM to deliver, really? Banks is no money? And comfortable toilets, apparently unprofitable, no entrepreneur fails to persuade?
In the same theme and another excellent suggestion, Minkowksi: tourist tax for the five regions, from the Altai to the Crimea. 150 rubles per day, multiply by two, for 10 days, you will receive 3000 rubles for each family as a Bush. The money also will go to the “tourist infrastructure”.
A great principle: first you pay us, and then we, maybe you’ll do something. However, I still can’t understand why this “something” must be done by the state, who requested.
In General, the season is relatively honest obtaining money from citizens over. “Lock the floors, now would be a robbery”.
