Home / Policy / Why Ukraine did it go wrong?

Why Ukraine did it go wrong?

Почему на Украине всё пошло не так?

 

 

 

Lately, Ukrainians, and the Ukrainians, too, often wonder – why another attempt to make Ukraine a normal European country loudly covered with a rusty basin. With a crash, a Bang and a broken head. Because like all good beginning. Talk about democracy, the landing of foreign reformers, on whom great hopes were pinned. Promises of help from the West…

And in the end… ?

The state crumbled in fact, the country territory living out their last days, the team of reformers was speclal taking the bags tightly stuffed folk and credit money in the country the war, losing the result of which will be a massive civil conflict in all areas (well except the westernmost, which the poles and the Hungarians has quietly return to myself). What went wrong – ask yourself a question people.

It’s simple, really. Everything goes on as usual. Ukraine originally meant as a temporary project. Suffice it to recall that the Constitution deigned to accept only after 5 years after “the state” supposedly square got. Was originally just a doubt “the state”, one of which was completely opposite on all issues on the other will last at least several years.

When we ( South-East) Kiev has promised to protect the rights of Russian, and the memory apparently promised that cutting the “Muscovites” you will be allowed, but her later. In the end, the way it came out, the Ukrainian “statehood” at the very least stretched more than a dozen years. That is, in fact, dismantling has not been canceled, just postponed it in the bottom Desk drawer.

And here, in the days of Yanukovych, it was already clear – it is necessary to solve something. Moving the boundaries were, logically, pass without bloodshed, with a referendum on the federalization after the signing of the Association agreement with the EU and the integration in the EEC would, in turn, rejected the Western part of the country. In total, the regions received legal and economic autonomy (unitarity at the same time as we understand completely heritsya) themselves would choose, in whose orbit they reside and in the end, the new border would be created by itself. Legally established would be a referendum or something like that and all. All thanks, all are free.

That would be the best option, but it was not taken into account the interests of the most “democratic” country in the world with a large number of not democratic “hawks” in political circles, for the most part non-public.

In the end, “maete scho maete”. Ukrainians lit like kittens, set on the Russian, during the war, successfully vigibase all the cash store, including ordinary people, but with such unprecedented success that all the previous administrations put together could not reach, well and the result will be the same. Border, conditional on the Dnieper river, and the enmity of one part of the population to another in the next couple of generations. And this is, admittedly, Anglo-Saxon, the hawks beat us.

Root cause section was just delayed in time. Geopolitical monster, hastily cobbled together from different pieces of the territories inhabited by people with completely different mentality for a long time could not exist in principle.

Sergey Alexander

Check Also

The UN’s ‘unofficial man’

Raphael Lemkin, a stateless Jewish refugee who died penniless, gave mankind’s greatest crime its name. …