I often tell friends to go into politics, I would have voted for you. But I answer – never. And not because I think politics as a dirty thing that they need to lie or, at least, to keep back. I just know myself a little better than others. Heart I am a liberal, and mind – statesman. And in that dissonance I would be running the country? I think it would hurt to hold so necessary to our country repression… I say repression? Sorry, slip of the tongue. I mean reform, of course. But how to reform, if you mentally suffer from each accepted you decision?
Liberal never and in no case should not meddle in politics and governance. In the mind of a liberal (meaning real, not a caricature, is the image fair, good and wise policy. And this is how he will strive. But in fact, moral leadership did not help him to govern effectively. On the contrary – they only hinder.
For example for the liberal, Peter – beast and monster. However, this man has done for the Russian state more than all the combined Russian liberals that lived in our country since ancient times. Stalin a liberal point of view – a maniac and a psychopath. But they built the state system unrolled fascism and freed Europe. Catch logical connection?
Statesman does not have to be a good person – he must be a good Manager. No one will hire a person because he has a beautiful soul. In sex no matter how you soft soul – matter how you strong character. Liberals constantly confuse warm with soft and persistently climb in a policy. But a liberal, I repeat, never, and nothing should not operate. Its historic task is to criticize the current regime with the intention that he was a little less cannibalistic. Effective management is more about pendel than rights and freedoms. But in the long run it is unthinkable without crying and damning the state of the liberals. They will not allow the state to slide into totalitarianism and slave labor leading to the regression.
A typical example of a liberal in power, Viktor Yushchenko, who took charge of the Ukraine with the total support of the population. And ended his reign the next elections where they scored less than 5% of the vote. Or take Nicholas II, who slapped the Bolsheviks in 1918. He was a wonderful man with such a set of positive qualities which are not possessed by any other Russian Tsar. His reign ended with the collapse of the state.
By the way just for Nicholas II the government again in the hands of the liberals. And it from them in the end, actually bare hands took Lenin, who believed the liberals shit. In short, if you want to spoil the thing – let his liberal. Only in the protection of human rights and the interests of society the liberals rule. Thanks to their efforts the society with a joyous whoop goes to labor camps, to strengthen there own state of shock work.
Therefore, knowing the historical doom of liberalism in matters of governance, I will never go into politics. The liberal in me says that it is impossible to defeat corruption executions. “Here shot in China – and corruption is still there.” And the statesman replies, “you Idiot! Even though you are a liberal, but consider? Shoot corrupt – it is just minus one corrupt. It’s basic arithmetic!”
Normal statesman, if necessary, have to write a resolution “to shoot”, thinking for just a second. And then – remembering how many letters “C” in this word. Because it is important for the efficiency of public administration. For the liberal, the most important thing – that his conscience is clear.
Liberal, passing by the bushes where the raped girl, proud of himself, thinking: “I helped the girl, but did not use immoral violence against the criminal.” In this cases, the victim will be released only when the offender decides to release it. A statesman is alien to many discussions, so rudely interrupts and puts the bastard to the wall. For victims of violence most importantly, the violence as soon as possible stopped. This task more efficient solves only a statesman.
