Home / Policy / “Twenty” without the “six”: the fate of Ukraine will discuss without Ukraine

“Twenty” without the “six”: the fate of Ukraine will discuss without Ukraine

"Двадцатка" без "шестёрки": судьбу Украины будут обсуждать без Украины

 

Hangzhou opens the G20 summit meeting of the heads of twenty leading countries of the world. The summit will be a meeting of heads of Russia, Germany and France, who will discuss Ukraine without the participation of the Ukraine. The “Normandy format” continues to exist, but without the participation of Kiev: after the scandal with the Ukrainian commandos in Crimea, Russia has insisted on the exclusion of Ukraine “Norman format”. Consent of Western leaders to discuss the fate of Ukraine in the “Normandy format” without the participation of Ukraine is a major diplomatic victory for Moscow and a major political defeat for Kiev.

The G20 summit last year in Brisbane was memorable public obstruction, which gave Western leaders Vladimir Putin. Fellow presidents and heads of governments pointedly ignored Russian leader Prime Minister of Australia invited Putin to apologize for the Malaysian “Boeing”, and the Prime Minister of Canada responded to the outstretched hand Putin phrase, “I Think I should shake your hand, but I’ll tell you just one thing: get out of Ukraine”.

Brisbane summit caused a sensation at the professional Russian fighters around the world, and in Kiev and its allies in Eastern Europe particularly. “Putin was sent to diplomatic Siberia”, – wrote the British press on prematurely left the summit in Australia, Russian President, saying about the set up in his honor of the boycott campaign that “few shed tears over such treatment of a despotic figure, causing such significant damage to the interests of their own country both at home and abroad.”

For every “deterrent of Russia” of the last G20 summit was just a holiday somehow. Brisbane – the point of no return! The ground you cannot turn back! Russia is now a rogue state! Moscow expects diplomatic isolation and international boycott, Putin would never fly to any international meeting – will be frightened of further humiliation, and Russia as a whole now washable with diplomatic map of the world.

After only six months it was discovered that the situation, to put it mildly, more complicated. Putin really didn’t fly, but it suddenly began to fly to Putin. The leaders of Germany and France, US Secretary of state, the President of the European Commission – they are all to the accompaniment of talks about complete diplomatic isolation and international boycott of the Kremlin making frequent visits to Moscow and St. Petersburg.

A year later, after Brisbane, the Russian President as if nothing had happened came at the G20 summit in Antalya and was there in the center of everyone’s attention: meeting “Big twenty” was held against the backdrop of the migration crisis, the terrorist attacks in Paris and anti-terrorism operations in Syria. To talk about the transformation of Russia into a pariah state on this background it was already quite silly.

A year later, the situation with the “global pariah” at the meeting of “twenty” is even more interesting.

Chinese in Hangzhou, the leaders of Russia, Germany and France will discuss the situation in Ukraine in “Normandy format”, while the fate of Ukraine will discuss the Ukraine: the Ukrainian leadership, at the insistence of the Russian side, the ability to go to the G20 summit was denied.

Previously it was assumed that in Hangzhou for a meeting in “Norman format” will arrive the President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko. For official Kiev the agreement about Poroshenko’s participation in the G20 summit was a great diplomatic success: Ukraine farther away, the less of a chance to get in the “Group of twenty” and to participate in the activities of the G20, and then the President of Ukraine participated in the forum of the heads of leading States and largest economies in the world. A visit to Hangzhou would be for Poroshenko no less a political trump card than the return to Ukraine Hopes Savchenko in the spring of this year, and Putin has provided the Ukrainian leader a big favor by agreeing to meet him at the G20 summit.

But then came the scandal with the subversive group of the Ukrainian defense Ministry are preparing attacks in the Crimea, and Russia announced the abandonment of the “Normandy format”. In any case, the Russian government will no longer have any dealings with Kyiv until there are negotiations prefer terror.

What was the reaction of Western leaders to the ultimatum of Russia?

The latter at first simply ignored the Ukrainian cries about “Russian aggression and provocation”, and then went to the expulsion of Ukraine “Norman format”, inviting Russia to continue negotiations on Ukraine in the same format, but without the participation of the President of Ukraine.

Because, as he said Azazello the administrator Varenukha, no need to lie on the phone, no need to be rude on the phone. The head of the United States, Germany and France appreciated the depth of reasoning Poroshenko about the fact that it is the Russian border guards and military just drunk drunk and shoot each other, and saboteurs Ukrainian defense Ministry, which went to rest in the Crimea, the Russian FSB abducted and transported to the Crimea from the territory of Ukraine.

The Ukrainian President warned from the beginning: honesty is the best policy. Poroshenko could confess and apologize for something that he ordered the sabotage on the territory of Crimea, or to admit that the security forces out of control of the Supreme commander and without his knowledge, were preparing terrorist attacks in Crimea. But the President has preferred to stick absolutely idiotic and offensive to those whom it is intended, the lie, which on a rational West obviously could not believe (of course except Lithuania, which, however, part of the West is not).

Merkel and Hollande are unable to come across a foreign policy and right to condemn Kiev – on the incident in the Crimea, they ultimately chose to simply remain silent. However, they also clearly expressed his altered attitude to the Ukrainian leadership that has decided to continue to communicate on the Ukrainian question in the “channel format” with Putin but without Poroshenko. Judging by the fact that President Barack Obama agreed with this option and did not insist on the arrival Poroshenko in Hangzhou and conducting “channel” of negotiations on Ukraine strictly with his participation, his diplomatic Phi official Kiev expressed in Washington.

The Western allies most severe humiliated Ukraine and its leader: they actually recognized the Kiev regime is their puppet, agreeing to discuss the fate of Ukraine without the Ukraine.

As for Russia, something about “global pariah” now not dare to say even after eating hallucinogenic mushrooms Lithuanian conservatives. Less than two years after the collective humiliation of Putin in Brisbane’s Western partners crossed from obstruction and boycott demands of the Kremlin. Russia has said it won’t be anything to talk with people who are organizing terrorist attacks, and the United States, Germany and France, de facto recognizing the justice of her anger, she agreed to reformat the “Norman format”. The continuation of negotiations with Russia for them was more important than the reputation of Ukraine.

So now the self-styled “experts” on Russia from the countries of the “cordon Sanitaire” as many are calling for the preservation of “European solidarity”, the extension and tightening of sanctions and the like. So what? When the conversation comes up to them, the senior Western comrades on their negotiations with Russia about their fate too will not be invited.

Check Also

The UN’s ‘unofficial man’

Raphael Lemkin, a stateless Jewish refugee who died penniless, gave mankind’s greatest crime its name. …