Reader Yuri writes: “the Dollar can’t collapse, because America’s economy is the most powerful in the world. And because it’s regular money for payments. The dollar is very convenient because of its highest liquidity in the world. And it suits everybody. But any new currency, its liquidity has yet to prove.”
Next is an interesting formulation. In response to my question: “And if I draw the money you take in payment for your labor?” Yuri answers: “Accept with joy, if I am sure that the money is legitimate, that is, I can buy what I need”.
Raising the question of legitimacy of means of payment, Yuri raises a very important question. I would argue that the Federal reserve system (FRS) builds his power on the key reception of black magic – the exchange of something for nothing. Because when the actual value is exchanged for actual zero, achieved the purpose of black magic (by the way reflected in the tales about the tablecloth-Samobranka, the horn of plenty, pikes at Emel, etc.)
The situation is the exchange of something for nothing is not a bluff, a fraud. This is our modern reality. Who can afford to exchange something for nothing? The owner of the system.
It’s not fraud, not fraud and not fraud. It is the exercise of the right of the Owner.
When you go to the fridge and take out the cheese or sausage, we have something to put instead? No, of course. The refrigerator, as your obliged to give you all their content in exchange for nothing – because you are the master and your will.
So, to better understand the nature of the dollar and his power – we need to imagine the planet Earth in the form of a large refrigerator. There is a lot of any products that the Owner gets when he wants and gives to whom he wants. Very important: for what it sees fit.
We go from the question that the fridge had not been replenished. Will not consider the problem that sausage and cheese in it come to an end. We generally will not consider here the problem of irresponsibility of the owner, which encourages parasites and buffoons, does not encourage hard work and invention, etc.
We are interested in the problem of legitimacy of the host, distribute (or not distribute) products to people.
After all, if the US dollar is the global unit of payment, by the United States it costs nothing (for the fed it is a zero symbol, nothing) – but it deals with the allocation of resources. This means that something in the open change for nothing.
To carry out this operation only the Master of the planet. So on what basis did the U.S. Federal reserve set by the owner resources of the entire planet? Indeed, to obtain such a benefit, as, for example, the Volga river, you need to win battles such as Stalingrad, Kursk, etc. in the Old days such problems were solved with the sword, and the owner determined after the battle…
But the US had managed not to conquer and steal the land from its owners. The owners of such do not paint, of course: suckers and mouth breathers. But the question remains: has all the resources of the earth, the surrender of their lease to developers for a substantial rental fee – as is legitimate and can be accepted unconditionally?
Now let me explain: the U.S. dollar is freely changed to the same Russian ruble and back. But when you buy dollar you pay more than the average value, and the sale will be less. This is one of the forms of rent that charge States with Russia and its economic entities for the use of resources.
Resource management essentially forms the entire net wealth, prosperity, poverty and extreme poverty. It may seem that John and Peter just gave someone else’s money that they among themselves the fruits of your labors have changed. But actually one who provides the money (the owner of the resources) – single-handedly decides who will be rich, who live in prosperity who are in poverty and who just to kill unnecessary.
It is not so noticeable in a subsistence economy (although it is there), but it especially sticks out when developed, extensive division of labor, high-tech economy.
Work without raw material (plus energy) resource that is needed for producing the product – not worth anything! Doesn’t understand Yuri, naively offering to sell the crop for my money, if they are legitimate… I just start to play the price of harvest and will be able to drive it in severe poverty. Breaking away from her, he will begin to work more and more, but it will not help him.
Multiplying the quantity of work he will not be able to increase your income because I’m entitled (as owner of the resources) to give him any price for resources.
And this is not a speculative scheme. This is an accurate and detailed description of modern Russian. Who are the people most needed? Farmers. They grow something without which we all live. No TV, no iPhone will be able to survive without bread, milk? And who is poorer than all lives? Farmers… what are they making the right product, earn the least?!
Theoretically they could all shut up for the belt. For example, Yuri two rubles. I have bread, and from some of Peter newspaper. Yuri on the ruble bought bread for ruble paper. I think – and that money to the side to miss? Without bread Yuri not to live! And make bread 2 rubles, taken all his money and Peter show Fig…
So actually it would be if farmers were owners of the resource that they use for work. After all, to argue with the fact that their work is the most important, it is impossible!..
I once wrote a parable about a great programmer who did the program for a million dollars each, and lived happily ever after.
He was caught, for example, the Wahhabis, put the stone bag and asked to make it program. He refused, and then he ceased to give water. Just water, not even bread, you know? And the water – it is free, it would seem… By the third day our programmer got on the wall, and a fourth for the glass of water and sat down to write the program before he bought for a million dollars.
What is the meaning of the parable? The work of the programmer (like any) is not in itself worth anything.
The programmer had two lives, two owners. In the first life resources the master gave him many benefits, encouraging his activities. In second life owner resources appreciated all his work in a glass of water. Try and disprove this assessment! What? Death without water? Well, the other to the same place to sit down and once again begin to torment…
Farmers live all poorer, not because their work is not to the right people. And because the resource allocator lives in cities, and the larger the city – the closer you are to the allocation of the resources (in the modern world is money).
It is the management of resources and creates the whole grid wealth, prosperity, poverty and extreme poverty. For the same work, the Owner Resources may also be assessed in the million dollars, and a glass of water.
Having their own, independent of money and rigidly pursuing the turnover of the currency in the country, we live his life. Having the same instead of the ruble, the dollar and the turnover of the dollar in its territory – we do not live their lives, and one that we will come up with the Master. And he maybe doesn’t like us… And in the case of the fed – ‘m willing to bet that he doesn’t…
We turn into the very village, world village, which is far from the Distributor, living in a big city. We can isranalytica in the trash, maim themselves by labour, to increase production to any level – and we will live poorer and poorer because the price of access to a resource we don’t make.
Sorry, dear to my heart, Union is very guilty before the world story that raised a generation of people who are sincerely convinced that rolls grow on trees… Yes, even to the trees! In fact there are in Africa breadfruit!
But even in this tree need to have access! And provides its owner. And it’s either you or not you. If not you, God knows what you will require from the owner for access to the grain of the wood where rolls are rising
