No, still the mind of the Russian candidate did not understand. Especially the opposition anti-Putin. These “violent” among them are almost gone. Preserved until the present day instances are just plain clowns whose task is to carry as much nonsense, against which not only the so-called “party of power”, but our sad system, the opposition would be examples of political adequacy. And the main thing is that for all the apparent variety of breeds, the opposition of different sizes, colors and colors behave almost the same. As if acting strictly within the framework specified in some manuals, whose authors were too lazy to teach his players more than a pair of triple binding on the teams.
In particular, anyone who tries to position himself as a fighter against the regimes, would have to resent the so-called “annexation” of the Crimea and demand that the “bloody gebni” the immediate return of the Peninsula to our crazy neighbor. With a relatively small interval about it publicly stated first, the leader of the Orthodox wing of the “fifth column” Mikhail Kasyanov, and then crawled out of mothballs Grigory Yavlinsky. The other day, “memorized poem” recited in interview to the newspaper “Kommersant” another rose from obscurity “grandmother of the Russian revolution” – Irina mutsuovna Khakamada. However, her lips the meaning of the promise, and the promise of meaning sounded a bit different. That indicates a return to the creative activity at least leave one of the beer curators of the campaign.
Daughter apocabigbang, do not forget to use in your speech the key word “annexation”, proposed to leave the Crimea as part of Russia, but Ukraine to pay some contribution.
– We can obtain the new military tensions between the two countries, and it will be a disaster – predicted Ms. Khakamada. – Well, how much can you fight? Sorry for the Ukraine, and Russia. All need in the world. Therefore, I believe that it is better and easier for us to pay Ukraine compensation.
To argue seriously with the candidate in the deputies of our Duma, using legal terms and waving under her nose stacks of documents and historical evidence is not necessary. At least because from a legal point of view, the indemnity should be paid to the losing side in the war to its winner. Irina mutsuovna our easy with ease blonde blurted out her favorite word. Much more interesting her thoughts on the new escalation and questions about the timing of the end of the war. I’d love to specify exactly which. No, the mentally ill individual is ready, of course, under any oath to attest to the fact of invasion of steppe of Ukraine Buryat Armada of submarines. But to elect such people in our state Duma, where the already creative rolls, it would somehow just too much.
In principle, from the Democrat of the first wave to wait for other revelations and was not necessary. However, in this case, the situation is somewhat complicated by the fact that Irina Khakamada put forward in Parliament not a bunch of professional eaters human rights sexual orientation, but a real party, and even positioning themselves as moderately Patriotic. Its leader, he is a business-Ombudsman of all Russia Boris Titov, a few months ago publicly came into stiff opposition from liberal economists who profess the cult of monetarism and Andrei Kudrin is his prophet. The party of the Ombudsman, like, eager to get into the Duma to protect the interests of domestic business, turning it into a locomotive of Russian progress. But an indecent proposal from party candidates could force the electorate to doubt the sincerity of the defender of the rights of small and medium-burzhuinov.
Interestingly, almost simultaneously with Khakamada Crimea vain commemorated two policies. Which, by the way, is more visible than the former ally Boris Nemtsov, and now Boris Titov. This refers to the candidate in presidents of the United States Donald trump and the acting Deputy of the National Assembly of France Thierry Mariani. And none of them, as it turned out, views Irina Mutsuovna not shared. The first promised, if elected “Emperor of the good,” to consider recognition of Crimea by the Russian Trotskyist variant, without annexations and indemnities. The second was even more freethinking. In a free translation from the French, his words could sound like “why the Hell is there to see it to know that the Crimea is Russia”.
It’s funny that a potential Manager of our irreconcilable geopolitical enemy and the parliamentarian of the countries supporting sanctions against Russia, ready to look at things realistically and to call a spade a spade. At the same time, the man offering himself to the Russians as the representative of their interests in the government completely ignores the majority opinion of their constituents and engaged in a foul-smelling political games, and not on the side of the state. This confusion may have two explanations. Either our opposition does “not go skiing, or party Boris Titov has received from the curators of the team to go the distance and never get in the way of samples is the political adequacy.
Explorer Noteru.com Boris Terekhov
