“little things”
Saying that liberals are not “white”. Actually, in my opinion, the situation is different.
Let’s see how currently define liberals in Russia.
They have two key defining points:
1. Adheres to a liberal market views on the economy. That is, the doctrine of inequality on the basis of property, at the time cleverly disguised as a bourgeois-democratic slogan of the French revolution “Liberty, equality, fraternity” (FR. Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité) – they have there. And more hidden and the belief in fundamental inequality of humans. Only the main vehicle for this is not direct physical oppression, and money, economic slavery, covered by a supposedly objective competition.
2. Liberals believe the West is the focus good and ready to be at the Beck and call of the West at any price
Of course, there are individuals who consider themselves liberals, whose views are somewhat different from Visaginas characteristics. But it is a deviation of personality, not the rule groups (classes).
Now let’s deal with the “white” (I will not name the historic and the modern generation of supporters of fundamental inequality “novobila”, by analogy with the neo-conservatives in the United States, to make it clear that we are not talking about the civil war 1918-1922.). I have written many times that the white (and novobila) – it’s just anticrazy. What does this mean? This means that the ranks of the “white” at the time, went all anti-Communists (anti-Soviet). Nothing like?
Walked all the anti-Communists, the entire spectrum from monarchists to….. liberals. And combines their anti-communism (or Sovietism, which is less accurate), based on their ideological basis – the belief in fundamental inequality. In their paradigm, the citizens, the majority will always be below the minority, the latter the oppressed and will be oppressed always.
So when you rightly despise modern liberals for papadopolos not forget that they are organically included in novobila community.
They opposed other parts of the Russian “novobila” community relative detail – the degree of love for the West, but no more. In his anti-Communist basis, they are unanimous. And it’s much more closer than a contradiction in effect the way and speed of merger with the West.
It is because of this “novobila” modern power in Russia, the liberals do not eject, no reject. She was a bit removed so they do not unnecessarily compromised all power before sleeping exploited majority. And that’s all. In this stop.
What follows from this for us, red? We must understand that all power in Russia – “novobila”. All. It presents approximately the same range of political views that were at one time in the Russian Empire. Only form of government adapted to the present the creation of democratic institutions a La the West. A return to the literal order of RI is impossible without mass outrage and high risk of losing power.
The concept of “novobila” – is much broader than the capitalist. Then there are all the political forces – from the monarchy to liberalism. They, in fact, still what to be. Just to be anticrisis. Because in power so well combined different lovers Mannerheim, Kolchaks, Stolypin, Krasnov and other people, can easily kill many thousands of members of the majority. Individual ideology is for them a secondary character. And the primary sign, giving the ticket to the power or its subservient communism.
After all, they now, in contrast to the elite of the Russian Empire know what red idea. Know your main enemy.
Therefore altered priorities.
They first United against the Reds, and then, second, a dog among themselves for different material quality. Yet they mostly manage to agree among themselves. Analysis of the reasons for this I might make later.
And yet – conclusions on the current policy of recent years.
1. Novobila changed tactics. In connection with the mistake of the West in regard to speed and methods of attack on the geopolitical interests of Russia he drove a manual novobila in the corner and it snapped. First, in Ossetia, then in the Crimea. In connection with the apparent loggerheads with the West, novobila dismissed his liberal part of the public and political domination. Not to tease people.
2. Novobila had embarked on Patriotic rhetoric and put forward the so-called statist part. To the Soviet Union, as the idea is that they can not handle, so they of necessity refer not to the West in search of a model, and in the Russian Empire, pulling out pieces of the type of Victory on may 9 of history of the USSR, the maximum bulging Patriotic sense of the events, maximally obscuring its ideological meaning and ideological reasons for the Victory.
3. Taking a sample of the Russian Empire, they act like the late Empire. Apart after the Crimea to some extent politically, they remain economically dependent on the West, only trying to weaken her degree.
4. Such action is not based on a conscious choice of victorious strategy. This action – the line of least resistance. It just allows them to dominate, straining minimum and maximum eating pleasure from life.
Conclusion.
So their policy is an obvious way leads to independence and development (especially accelerated). The Russian Empire as a role model is weak, dependent, in many respects, the country is catching up way of being. The only sample in Russian history, when sharply accelerated catch-up development partially moved into advanced development (the fruits of which Russia enjoyed until now) is the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.
Soviet forward-looking developments is allow something to compete with the West. But the logic of creating guarantees for the ruling elite, elected novobila (lowering the level of the people to the level of Russian Empire), will inevitably lead to the degradation of not only people studying for the exam with the trend of the debilitation, but to the degradation of the bureaucratic elite, and in the late Soviet Union is no longer the former particularly clever.
And then the West will take vengeance for all.
Than red is better (as in less worse) To Putin than Navalny, Mikhail Kasyanov and To? The fact that he holds at least the minimum of sovereignty. The process of degradation if it does not carry landslide character. They go pseudantechinus way. As in the Russian Empire.
If you have conditional Kasyanov and they would go fast and conscious surrender of the country.
That makes all the difference.
Under Putin we have a chance to gather strength, when Kasyanov will not. Or someone thinks that the forces to come, will it not? It’s hard to imagine a more fragmented range than the so-called “left”.
But whether those who consider themselves red, instead of study, to unite, be structured and organized to continue doing this with each other? Or use the time until novobila are guided by those who do not want to hand over to Russia immediately, to create its powerful political force is an open question.
