Oleg Tsarev: Residents DND and LNR for the escalation of the conflict
15 Aug 2016
Oleg Tsarev // PHOTOS NSN
Former speaker of the Parliament of new Russia Oleg Tsarev told NSN about a possible escalation of the conflict in the Donbass.
Ex-speaker of the Parliament of new Russia Oleg Tsarev in an interview with NSN said that Donbas residents are largely in favor of aggravation of the situation in the region, to stop the constant shelling from mortars and artillery from the Ukrainian side.
So Tsarev commented on the possible escalation of the conflict in the Donbass after the prevention of terrorist attacks in the Crimea.
In particular, “Vedomosti” reported Moscow’s decision in this regard stop the deterring retaliatory actions of the army of the DNI in response to regular shelling by the Ukrainian security forces.
Tsarev said that of course the DNR listen to the recommendations of Moscow, since Russia has been providing humanitarian and political support, without which the DNI and the LC would not have survived, and defends the interests of the Republic of Donbass on the international stage. Therefore, the management of DND and LNR takes into account the recommendations and opinion of the Russian leadership.
Political scientist: Putin will not talk with Poroshenko after the events in the Crimea
Deterrence of retaliation is always present, as the position of Russia is that from the implementation of the Minsk agreements by the DNI and LC as small as possible claims,” – said Tsarev.
The opinion of the population of new Russia, according to Tsarev, today it is possible to put into words: “Better a horrible end than horror without end.”
As it became known yesterday, the Russian security Council discussed the situation with the reciprocal actions of the Russian Federation after the arrest subversive group that planned a series of terrorist attacks in the Crimea.
About a powerful retaliatory military strike it is not, however, one option might be to stop the containment of Moscow’s retaliation Donetsk people’s Republic.
A precedent has already been in the spring of 2016, when deterrence was weakened after the attempted seizure of the Ukrainian security forces and the neutral zone, defined by the Minsk agreements.
