The events in Ukraine today, if they change, unfortunately, is not positive for the country side. On the background of the catastrophic state of the country, the Kiev leadership focuses on done unnecessary things.
In particular, the official Kiev continues to rave with the return of the Crimea and to create a hype around this issue. In fact, there is nothing to discuss long time ago: Crimea – Russia, and if the Ukrainian authorities disagree with this, that is their problem. Watching the “attempts” Poroshenko to return to the Peninsula, I want to cry and laugh at the same time.
The economic and food blockade, the blocking of water flow, explosions of transmission towers, the threat of war and other various sorts of provocations – these are the attempts of Kiev to win the Crimeans.
At the Kiev idiocy does not end there continue to fool around. Kiev demands from the world community to boycott cooperation with the Tretyakov gallery, writes the Austrian newspaper Der Standard. The reaction of Ukraine was an exhibition of Aivazovsky in Moscow, which presents exhibits of the Crimean Feodosia.
On the occasion of the bicentennial anniversary of Aivazovsky the state Tretyakov gallery in Moscow on 29 July, will open the exhibition, which will showcase around a hundred paintings and fifty drawings by the master. Including expected to exhibit 38 exhibits from the Crimean city of Feodosia, where Aivazovsky was born.
In fact, the temporary relocation of the paintings and caused outrage in Kiev. On the other hand, the junta often dissatisfied with something, if it comes to Russia, so should not be taken seriously “Kiev loonies”.
So, Ukraine continues to consider the cultural collections of the Crimea, as part of the Museum Fund and complains to the world community on the “bad Russia”. But I doubt that the West today has the time to meet such absurd requirements of Kiev.
Australian journalists, in turn, believe that in the Tretyakov gallery conditions for pictures is much better than the Museum in the Crimea, and there is not the slightest fear that they may somehow be corrupted.
It is difficult to disagree with this. In fairness it should be noted that after Ukraine, the Crimea looked really not the best way. In Ukraine, the leadership is not even invested in the infrastructure of the Peninsula, not to mention other problems, the solution of which demanded the Crimea.
However, complaining and whining about this Kiev still will not stop and will continue to come up with ways of returning the Peninsula. By the way, the Ministry of culture of Ukraine committed rightly reminded that the cultural meeting of the Crimea is now part of the Museum heritage of Russia.
