In the United States established a practical anarchy
TOPICS:http://topnewsrussia.EN/tag/geopolitika/” rel=”nofollow”>Геополитикаhttp://topnewsrussia.ru/tag/%d1%81%d1%88%d0%b0/” rel=”nofollow”>USA
30.09.2016
10
http://topnewsrussia.ru/” rel=”nofollow”>topnewsrussia.ru
BuzzFeed News reports about events that, perhaps, pull on the scandal in the American White house. Vice Chairman of the intelligence Committee in the Senate Diane Feinstein and Adam Schiff, occupying a similar position in the House of representatives formally accused Russia of”trying to influence American elections.” Apparently, they just can’t accept the fact that someone decided to act quite a for American, cracking the server of the democratic party of the United States.
Even to publish his statement they have no circus could not: it refused to publish urgently, several times postponing this moment for later, and the White house persistently tried to dissuade applicants.
The talks were attended personally by the President’s chief of staff Denis McDonough that indicates the level of events.
In the end, with them managed to negotiate the publication of statements in the reduced version, which contains, for example, the following:
“We believe that the orders of the Russian intelligence agencies to carry out such actions could only come from the top Russian authorities. We call on President Putin to immediately order the cessation of such activities”.
So the first official confirmation of U.S. officials that the Kremlin is actively trying to manipulate the public’s confidence in the electoral system of the United States, was announced. It is significant that during the whole history of the White house, according to BuzzFeed News, has consistently refused to comment.
The statement noted that “the Kremlin went on the aggressive offensive” and gave the White house a sad choice between the open accusation of Russia of trying to sow chaos” that, according to the senators, would increase the danger of cyberwar”, and multiple criticism because of the weakness of Putin.
In principle, it is clear that the statement was made in light of the already overexposed from mid-summer statements about the fact that de Russia held a series of cyber attacks to influence the election of the President of the United States. So, in July of this year Foreign Policy has accused Russia of hacking and publication of materials on WikiLeaks, “one of the two major political parties in the United States.”
“This act is not just about intelligence gathering. It was clearly designed to damage the US, to undermine our credibility and trust to us. Perhaps this move was also aimed at weakening the position of Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton.”
Foreign Policy
So voiced the accusation was nothing new. Because of this, the more I wonder why to pick it up again, playing a Comedy?
To answer this question we must turn to the recent events that are happening today on the diplomatic front. So, at the end of September, state Department spokesman Kirby Schacon brazenly declared: Will be shot down more Russian planes, the Russian military will be in body bags, and the terrorists can initiate actions on the territory of Russia, if that “will not stop the violence” in Syria.
The Ministry of defence, of course, such audacity has answered quite sharply:
“…we know exactly where and how specifically in Syria, including in Aleppo province, is discreet “experts” involved in operational planning and direction of operations of militants …in the case of attempts to implement these threats, is not the fact that the militants are the bags and the time to bail”.
American politicians immediately gave reversed, personally John Kirby tried to explain, saying, do not misunderstand, it was about old losses, not the threat of a new.
Technique known: “I not I, and not my horse”. But his eyes are honest-honest.
To believe Washington and so there is no reason, especially if everything sounded dobavitsya Secretary of defense Ashton Carter’s readiness to use nuclear weapons in case of armed conflict with participation of Russia, made on 26 September.
American “hawks” repeatedly threatening Russia with everything from terror and to the use of nuclear weapons. They did there is a bold, even reckless. Recall that in June, appeared in the media information about a certain document, signed by more than fifty employees of the US state Department, the essence of which was the expression of frustration with the peace-loving policy of the Obama administration and the leadership of the country as a whole who refuse decisive action in Syria, including surgical strikes on government positions.
Practice confirms this position have very influential people in the government that literally divides the White house in two. The last significant example of this is, of course, the failure of the accord on Syria. After long negotiations between Lavrov and Kerry that took place on 9 September, when, it would seem that agreements were reached and the United States agreed to determine the list of immoderate terrorists from the moderate opposition, on September 17, the American gunships, with the support of fighters in Deir ez-Zor attacked the positions of Syrian government forces, helping the advancing terrorists and killing more than 60 people.
“Made a mistake”.
The U.S. military has openly defying Obama and Kerry, seeking confrontation with Russia. Of course, they need a President who will be soon, is absolutely not a hindrance.
The Senate also has an opinion different from the President. The last illustrative example, otonabee Barack Obama (and with a score of 97 votes in favour, 1 against) a bill allowing family members of those killed in the attacks of September 11, 2001, to file lawsuits against Saudi Arabia.
What conclusions follow from this?
Now in USA practical anarchy: Obama does not make sense to do anything, and it is ignored in important cases. The election struggle was really serious. Within its framework, of course, not personally trump personally opposed to Clinton, confront each other, two powerful factions with sometimes conflicting interests. That’s why the military and commit such foolish acts — showing his loyalty to, relatively speaking, by a group of warmongers.
The outcome of the elections — then the passion will subside.
However, an important another aspect: those “hawks” very much surprised when the United States has to apologize, to admit wrong or at least hear a confident response from the Russian side — not used to this, and it is time. I have the feeling that once the supporters of the aggressive policy was so surprised by the appearance in Crimea polite people that are still in a stupor and unwilling to part with his beloved illusion of a weak and dependent Russia.
Source
