After the release of the new “Ghostbusters” film critics and journalists have found themselves in an unusual situation: they had to protect the film from the audience, taking over the functions of free lawyers. All because of conservative fans long before the release of pictures declared a real war, accusing the filmmakers that they ruined the story (though the original Director Ivan Reitman here is among the producers). Maybe that’s why the tone of most reviews, positive and polemical.
“Ghostbusters”: reviews of the world’s leading film editions
The New York Times: “In the Wake of slime and under a huge cloud of perfect fluids”
“Trapped in a cinema on a wave of slime and under a huge cloud of perfect fluids, new (and adorable stupid) “Ghostbusters” – this is a rare case of a genuine gift from a large Studio. The film, which contains an insane amount of adorable and naughty fun. Enjoy it soon because it happens not too often, especially in the summer, even though it is considered to be a typical season for a pleasant cinema. And if this summer someone will accidentally wander into a screening of “the Hunters”, he will be forced to admit that this is the prettiest bauble you so bored during most other summer blockbusters.”
Trailer of the movie “Ghostbusters”
ABC News: “Reception with the movement of the proton backpacks with masculine spin on women’s work”
“If in the original movie Ghostbusters fought exclusively against supernatural manifestations, now they have a truly dangerous opponent – public opinion. It refers to those people who have not seen the movie, but said a lot of nasty things about the actors and the Director. Meanwhile, it should be noted that although this pattern is unlikely to be eclipsed in the memory of the audience the first film, but the reception with the movement of the proton backpacks with masculine spin on women’s work. “Ghostbusters” is a fascinating picture, which also pays homage to (next witty ways) the Comedy with which many of us grew up and which is still love.”
“Ghost hunters”: video from the filming
Rolling Stone: “These guys really decorated the new “Hunters”Not superuser, but not the failure of feminist rebooting “Ghostbusters” was created in order to kinofabrika had a nice time. But Internet”trolls” continue to drivel about who played the main roles for Actresses of the time, as was the announcement of the results of the casting. One of them, for example, wrote the following: “I heard in the new “Hunters” will not be a proton pack. Heroine will just make the brain ghosts until will pass the nerves and they won’t fall off”. I wonder did Hillary Clinton such a number of sexist shit as the four performers of the main roles? Even if got, it doesn’t change anything. So to engage in serious discussions with the authors of this crap would be absurd. But let’s say: guys, relax! These girls really graced the new “Hunters”.
“Ghostbusters”: a fragment of the film
The Washington Post: “Radiant, slimy and fundamentally stupid movie”
Radiant, slimy and fundamentally stupid, “agentgreeny” film “Ghostbusters” should immediately cease all preceding its release scandals. Not buying into the skeptical and frankly sexist provocation was enjoyed by the audience after the first materials about the picture, this feature is a joke created as if specially in order to remind the audience about what purpose removed such pictures. Not for discussions about gender politics, not for the desecration of the Holy foundations of the previous generations. It’s just easy and enjoyable family Comedy.”
“Ghostbusters”: a fragment of the film
The Hollywood Reporter: “the Heroines terribly uncomfortable to be on the same team””More than anything in this film is striking, the total lack of “chemistry” between the four heroines who seem terribly uncomfortable to be on the same team, despite all attempts by the filmmakers to prove that it is not. Kate McKinnon is better of all, constantly breathing life into his character, an eccentric engineer Gillian Holzmann, which creates weapons for hunters – from the famous proton blasters to more sophisticated things.”
“Ghostbusters”: a fragment of the film
Time Out London: “not Much miss the feeling of a live new York “Kate McKinnon – the main advantage of the film. Her Holzmann – a magnificent creature of pure physical Comedy: all these pseudo-victory gestures, strange winks and curses to itself is simply beautiful. She is the best reason to see the movie… Very much miss the feeling of living in new York, which was in the original film. Where, for example, the crowds of admiring citizens who welcome hunters? Whatever it was in front of us the summer blockbuster, which operates a posse of women who consider themselves very smart.
Regardless, here’s a summer movie starring a girl squad who are proud of their big brains. You could call that a supernatural event in itself.
“Ghostbusters”: a fragment of the film
Time Magazine: “This painting is not done to someone something to prove.” No one is obliged to love the new “Hunters”, or at least to sympathize with them. But all who continue to fight against this film on the grounds that “my childhood has been betrayed! I hate those Actresses! The trailer was bad!”, be ridiculous. Because it is quite independent work, witty and ingeniously played up the film Ivan new York. This painting is not done to someone something to prove. It is in order that we laughed heartily. But for the sake of it and made a summer Comedy”.
“Ghostbusters”: a video about the car Ecto-1
Variety: “Paul Fig “raised” almost all played in the film by 32-year-old actors. As an optional gift to all fans of the film, the 32-year-old Paul Fig “raised” almost all who played it… Their appearance in the frame adds nothing to the movie, including a winged dragon, which breaking in to the concert metal, and a giant logo of the animated series about the Ghostbusters in the frame… In the end, the animated series was more popular than the film itself, so it’s not at all surprising. However, it is easy to think about how Sony plans to use the name “Ghostbusters”. Decisions can be very controversial, given the steps that have been taken this time to “reset.”
“Ghost hunters”: video on gadgets
The Guardian: “the Spirit of rebellion and denial in the new film saved.” The fans are not wrong: this film is really far from the original in new York. So far, that it is worth paying attention to. Mention only the fact that the original film opened bill Murray, his character with the tenacity of a pervert sought a night with a date with a schoolgirl. And in the second movie heroine Sigourney weaver had nothing else to do than to worry about the safety of her child. And while this spirit of rebellion and denial in the new film saved, everything here is warmed by the warm flow of nostalgia, flowing through the veins of this Comedy”.
