Recently, a well-known Russian journalist published in his account of this post: “the United States want all fought against all. And no one fought against them. And USA will sell weapons.” I believe that the list of aspirations of “exceptional” powers is much broader. Spelled out in the US by transnational elites want not just planetary war and the possibility of pitting all against all, sitting at the ocean.
The UN security Council have not WADA
These elites aspire to the whole world depended on them in awareness-mental, financial-economic, political and other areas, recognize the total superiority of “exceptional” nation and endured its unconditional supremacy.
Indeed, in this case, TNCs and the United States will be able to sell to the world not only weapons, but all that brings profit. And something to sell and something to take away by force or “dispose of” fraudulently.
This is the essence of the moment, which is not usually discussed in Western media and at the meetings of the UN General Assembly. Well, if someone suddenly put from the rostrum of the United Nations, the question about the true causes of world wars and military conflicts, the representatives of the USA and their vassals always have the option to shut the mouth of truth-seekers in many different ways.
For example, on 25 September representatives of the United States, great Britain and France during the performance of the Syrian Ambassador to the UN Bashar ja’afari demonstratively left the Hall.
These tricks as well as the extent of “cheating” (a term used by the permanent representative of Russia to the UN Vitaly Churkin on addressing the Syrian issue during Sunday’s meeting of the UN Security Council) by the Western coalition forces at the highest level, affect any healthy imagination. In particular, in late September, Russia raised a question about the necessity of convening a special meeting of the UN security Council on the situation in Syria. That was more than appropriate after the U.S. air force launched an airstrike against Syrian army positions near Aleppo and foiled thus the Russian-American agreement on Syria. However, this is quite a logical initiative of the Russian side caused a full-blown U.S. representative to the UN Samantha Power, who called the initiative “cynical and hypocritical trick”.
And now – less than a week, as such an initiative (a proposal urgently to discuss the situation in Syria at a meeting of the UN security Council), now clearly inspired by the occasion, were made by the United States itself. And, turning the situation to their side of the accused has become the Prosecutor, accused of inappropriate actions in Syria, the Assad regime and Russia.
Let me remind you that the reason for the attack the state Department for Russia and Assad in the UN attack was unknown whether the aircraft, or mortars on a convoy of the UN in the area of Urum al-Kubra, which is September 19 this year was kind of taken goods on an obscure address – despite the fact that the US is accusing the Syrian and Russian planes in this attack, are not going to confirm any evidence of any presence of the mentioned aircraft in the sky over the convoy during the airstrike nor the fact of bombardment… Well, as in the case of the Malaysian “Boeing”, shot down in the skies over Donbas in July 2014, and more in dozens of other similar cases. Like, not Imperial this business – to prove the obvious.
It turns out that the state Department seeks “exclusive” prerogatives for not only the Olympics but also in the UN Security Council, acting under the Charter and regulations of this organization.
Fortunately, the Security Council of the United Nations have not yet privatized transnational pharmaceutical companies WADA, to one with only light pressure on some officials to deprive Russia of voting rights.
USA does not want peace in Syria
The purpose of the next, and certainly “cynical and hypocritical” (quote from Pauer), the antics of the US in the UN security Council (the indictment of Assad and, indirectly, the leadership of Russia in the attack on the humanitarian convoy of the United Nations) several.
On the one hand, the presentation of a completely far-fetched claims that the Syrian leadership is intended to cover up the main provocation of the Pentagon last week, an airstrike on the positions of government forces and disruption thereby of the agreement with Russia on 9 September.
On the other hand, the gathering of the emergency meeting of the UN security Council at the end of September should be seen as another provocation. Not so much against the Syrian authorities, but also against Russia. Because for every claim Assad is really lies the indictment of the Russian leadership, the actions of which supposedly there are no other motives, in addition to supporting the “bloody dictator”.
Once again accusing Russia of supporting “bloody Syrian regime” and not presenting in support of this thesis, any evidence, the US and its vassals excitedly started talking about necessity of creation in the skies over Syria no-fly zone. Keeping in mind, of course, the ban on flights in the skies over their own state aircraft of the Syrian army and invited to this country by the government of Syria aircraft of the Russian HQs.
I believe that all these Jesuit moves with Washington shifting blame and responsibility from a sick head on healthy and various substitutions remains unchanged the main purpose of the provocation and initiative of the state Department and the Pentagon on the Syrian track. USA does not want peace in the region. Even if the war will go to the last Syrian.
“Fracture” of the Syrian war
Cynicism at an emergency meeting of the UN security Council was the approval of the diplomatic representatives of the USA, joined by leading European countries (France, UK, Italy and Germany) on “the impermissibility of military actions of the Syrian regime in Eastern Aleppo” and “attack” (!?) the city, in fact, captured terrorists, turning it into their base.
Where are all these terminological absurdity and information sell? Yes, all from the same confidence of Washington, he allowed everything, while his opponents only that which pleases US.
Meanwhile, the confidence of the state Department of permissiveness is increasingly becoming a caricature.
One of the caricatures – the demands of Washington and the European dwarfs to the Syrian and Russian troops to stop the “attack” on Aleppo… the Analogy with Stalingrad here suggest themselves: well, it’s as if in 1942 “the international community” has demanded from the Soviet leadership to stop attacking the Nazis captured Stalingrad, under the pretext that the attacks of the Soviet air force killed de civilians.
In fact, it is obvious that in the case of the capture of Aleppo in the Syrian war can occur fracture. And here the question arises: is this because Western politicians became hysterical about the prospect that the coalition led by the United States actually is not interested in the defeat of the terrorists?
“UN Secretary-General ban Ki-moon appalled by military escalation and bombing in Aleppo, Syria”, – said the press-service of the UN, it seems, having read messages from the “open source” about the horrors experienced by the inhabitants of Aleppo, allegedly as a result of the blows the Russian and Syrian aircraft on residential areas. However, they are not destroyed in this city, for example, a pump station, resulting in hundreds of thousands of residents of Aleppo have been without water. And not they supply weapons to captured the city of terrorists.
Policy “exceptional” nation, it seems, do not notice that in addition to Western civilization in the world are made husband and other, alternative civilizations, build relationships among themselves on essentially new – a parity basis.
The West is weakening
Sell long been the main weapon of the West’s attacks on Russia. And this weapon is far more dangerous phosphorus bombs, chemical weapons and other banned weapons used by the terrorists against government forces in Syria. Because these weapons are often invisible, though, and has enormous destructive power.
Meanwhile, the strong do not need to sell and all sorts of insinuations, provocations and rascaldom. Such weapons usually turn weak when they have nothing helps.
Thus, the West based in the desire for world domination for the Arsenal of these tools, actually weakens. Western politicians, as I believe, gradually beginning to realize their geopolitical defeat (somewhere at the subconscious level), and therefore with even greater zeal continue to pretend that their civilization has no alternative.
I’m afraid that soon it may happen that when the US and its vassals once again “insulted” to leave the courtroom UN during the speech of the representative of an enemy country, they may not be allowed back.
