China bought America. America in response to the wants of censorship. Dmitry Kosyrev
Publication date: 23 September 2016, 20:15
If someone thinks that “the Kremlin is intervening in the presidential election process in the United States — home American horror story, it is not so. There are horror stories and postbaseline. This is China, who just bought America. First of all, in the field of information — and it is not just, for example, radio stations, and Hollywood.
Hollywood fears
China, as expected, very closely followed by all sorts of anti-Chinese shares in the United States. So he missed the emergence of a video site called “China owns the US”, is very well-known Center of American security.
If you included a few years ago search on is the “possession”, that is, China Owns US, we’d find a lively exchange of views about money. That is that America is deep in debt to China, since Beijing has been actively buying government bonds.
But today, this trouble goes for Americans on the back burner. They even explained: think we owe them $ 1.3 trillion — but who we just don’t have. It is not clear who is the problem now, or our Chinese.
There are things more serious about them and referred to in the video security Center. For example, the transaction, the results of which China can get USA network from 8 thousand cinemas. Or the fact that today the second superpower controls 15 American radio stations.
It turns out the conversation about that, while the US, or some Europeans are fighting in the throes of inexplicable to them about the success of Russia Today or “Satellite”, China has achieved a lot more success in the sphere of mass media and not just ideology. Including through investment in this area.
That is, China wins the West on the field, which before were considered hopelessly tilted to the West.
Video tells you about how the Chinese have actually bought all of Hollywood, including Disney. It’s not only about real Chinese multibillion-dollar investment in this lucrative business. And not even that on Chinese screens go to movies although Hollywood, but Hollywood actually produced by the Chinese.
The main thing — here it is: self-censorship in Hollywood. Americans are afraid to make movies that will offend someone in China, because then they don’t get revenue from the Chinese market. In the “Red dawn rewrote a movie about the invasion of China invasion of North Korea. Have ottsenzurovan the scene when the space aliens break the Great wall — suddenly it will upset the Chinese.
That response can and should be done: video offers to declare the field of the mass media (and movie too) “strategic”, that is to erect a “Chinese wall” against the ideological dominance of Beijing. This, of course, about the censorship in any form. By the way, this is the standard response of “Westerners” in the Russian international media: to shut, to keep out.
Why is the US afraid, and in China no
As a responsible for this is the “Chinese propaganda”? Complacent and condescending. Reminds you that if you look at what makes American business in China, you can open the site “USA swallow China.” Moreover, a large part let the quoted rent, but still going there American movies still American.
A large part of China’s translated books, is also from the USA. And for Chinese students the US is the preferred choice for education. Not to mention the fact that the production of Chinese cars, smartphones, software, and other things can’t do without American technology.
That is, China believes in the globalization of the economy, is not afraid of it and believes that globalization is favorable for him. The Americans or part of them are afraid they will lose this they invented the game.
For example, a Chinese analyst — with infographics and other images — in fact that exports of Chinese goods around the world creates a solid Foundation for strengthening the global Chinese influence. Here even there is a idea that was “globalization 1.0”, then the West, apparently) thought her win created an international organization, pushed back the government. And now unfolding of “globalization 2.0”, when it turned out that after all her move countries and States.
Mentioned Analytics politely puts China 4th in the world on the impact of globalization, but notes that its role is growing rapidly. In this and other material is a simple idea that the instrument of influence — a high-tech Chinese products, exciting world.
And the United States, or the people thinking in the “us buys China”, appear in the ridiculous role of the globalists who are concerned about the ideological struggle, the superiority of Western values and seriously propose to close the doors to the ideological influence of Beijing.
Good value if they should so protect it from Russia Today, from Chinese investors in Hollywood.
If we talk only about videosite China Owns US and there in terms of ideology, everything is simple and primitive. Demonstrated long-dead comrade Mao stated that the Chinese investors in the US have good connections with the leaders of the Chinese Communist party”… People who seriously think that today’s China is Communist, hopeless. Because the most interesting phenomenon of the rise of China — just his deideologized.
For the Chinese onslaught of information to the outside world it is interesting to observe. The fact that no channels Beijing is not broadcasting its ideology. Just because he has seriously no, just the usual message to the audience about the fact that there is such a big, ancient, economically and in every strong civilization — China.
Beijing does not promote the ideas of Marx or Mao, is that of Confucius. By the way, Russia does not export to the world ideological alternative. Max — his vision of the facts in some international subjects, especially if those facts somehow hidden and concealed information from other sources. No one has promised “to bury”, as did Nikita Khrushchev in a bygone era (he only meant that capitalism goes, and communism will remain forever).
And then that scared us bad for an American or a globalist (Western version) the patriots? The conclusion remains simple: only what we have. Or rather, that someone, except the West, there may be some influence in the world, including through investment and the sale of goods. Well, if someone else offers some rules and trade rules, not to mention alternative positions about war and conflict — it is generally awful.
Dmitry Kosyrev
