In order to once again pit Germany and Russia, the UK needs a free hand
In the British Parliament called for a tough response to the growth of the military power of Russia. This is stated in a special report on the impact of Russia on the security of the United Kingdom.
The report prepared by the Defense Committee of the Parliament of great Britain to celebrate the opening of the upcoming NATO summit, which will discuss the issues of deterrence of our country.
It would seem, however, that after the decision of the British voters to withdraw from the European Union in Britain needs to be other problems. Let me remind you that 51,89% of voters voted to leave the EU, and only 48,11% for it to stay.
The referendum results were a cold shower for the British elite. The resignation of Prime Minister David Cameron. At the moment inside the Conservative party is the election campaign the new party leader and head of the Cabinet will be elected in the near future.
It would seem that in such a political situation of Britain is not the time to engage in foreign intrigue. However, as you can see, the time to containment of Russia is. The question arises, is it really a spontaneous decision by the United Kingdom to leave the EU, or it stands for shrewdness?
Observers have drawn attention to the very restrained reaction of the US administration to “Brakcet” (as called in the West the process of withdrawal of Britain from the EU). Say, came and went, what is the problem?
This is a very strange position, given the fact that Britain has always been considered a “Trojan horse” of the US within the EU, have affected the very presence of this powerful economic bloc and not allowed to turn it into “United States of Europe.”, that is, competitor of the US on the world stage.
Maybe the American administration does not believe the exit of Britain from the EU? But the leaders of the Conservative party say that the output will be. Prime Minister Cameron has resigned, but said other policies would lead Britain “exit” from the EU.
For the Conservative rejection of the results of the referendum is equal to political suicide, she was on the 2015 elections under the slogan of the vote. The conservatives have collected the voices of skeptics with promises to hold a referendum and carry out his decision. If they want to stay in power, they cannot ignore the opinion of the 17 million voters who voted for secession from the EU.
The European Union without Britain is turning into a total Kingdom of Germany, the new Holy Roman Empire of the German nation, or, as politically incorrect joke, in the Fourth Reich.
This is a new edition of Europe under the leadership of the Germans. It’s ever existed twice. In the Third Reich of Adolf Hitler, seized the whole of Europe, and Union of the Central powers, Wilhelm II. In the latter case, only Germany controlled Central Europe in the face of its ally Austria-Hungary.
Both times excessive pilusa its position on the European continent, Germany attacked Russia. Both times it led to the defeat of Germany and significant damage to our country, the result of which was the rise of the Anglo-Saxon world.
It seems to pit Germany and Russia resolved today. But to do this, Britain needs a free hand, you need to stand by while the Pro-German European Union will unfold to full-scale conflict with our country. And for this it would be nice to leave the EU. This will not commit himself to the conflict the EU and Russia, but to all the profits as the “third rejoicing”.
What nonsense, what conspiracy theories? – say enlightened reader, dropping the monocle in your morning yogurt. How can a country that provoked two world wars, provoked the third? Oh Yes, it can.
Let me remind you that the boldness of Kaiser Wilhelm, who started the First world war, was due to hopes for British neutrality. In London if there was Pro-German party, which promised to William that does not intervene in the war. First, in case you will not be attacked by France, then in the case that will not be attacked Belgium.
Apparently, the Kaiser decided that he was dealing with the usual demagoguery. On 1 August 1914, Germany attacked Russia, but Britain was silent. 3 August, the Kaiser declared war on France, and then silence. And only after the attack on Belgium, Britain felt that it needed to intervene and declared war on Germany.
The delay of the British held to the incitement of world war I, many historians believe that it would not be, said Britain strongly that intervene in case of an attack on its allies in the Entente. However, London did everything to the Kaiser the impression that the British intervention will not be. In the end, Berlin is stuck in the world war, the main burden of which was France and Russia, and “super prize” at its end received Britain and the United States.
The situation is similar in the 30-ies, when London actively created Hitler the impression that Britain is neutral, it is only necessary to attack the Soviet Union. Britain went to the Munich agreement with Hitler allowed him to divide Czechoslovakia, nothing was done to save Poland. Thus, again, Hitler was invited to attack the Soviet Union. Hitler took advantage of the invitation, though on its own terms – subjecting the pre-France.
The result of the Second world war was the enormous loss of our country and the incredible rise of the Anglo-Saxon world, which has practically no competitors. Europe, where at the beginning of the 20th century has made the entire world policy, was divided, as a divided Germany was.
Today the situation is repeated. Germany, who led the European Union, as strong as ever. Russia is weak and thrown away to the East, to the borders of almost of Ivan the terrible. Ukraine went to the West and becomes a protectorate of the EU. The situation for the conflict from Germany’s perfect.
You only need to help the Germans to “see the future”. Britain is actively involved. The report of the Defence Committee requires to strengthen sanctions against Russia to bail.
It would seem, what business of Britain just voted for withdrawal from the EU, will be strengthened sanctions or not? It turns out that to have the whole thing.
There is an enlightened reader laughs resonant, compassionate laughter, and say that Russia has silikonovaja army and a Nuclear Bomb. Who dare to go against our Nuclear Bombs?
Notice that the Soviet Union and armies and bombs was greater than that of the RF current. However, no Soviet Union on the map I do not watch. Not to mention the fact that in the modern world possible conflicts low and medium intensity, is not turning into open war. Like the one that we see now in Ukraine. War is, and the nuclear bombings there.
Germany boosts spending on defense (this was already said Chancellor Angela Merkel), Poland strengthens the armed forces. All this is justified by the fight against Russian aggression. But as we know from history, any government always covers up its aggressive plans of chatter about the risk posed by neighbors.
Sign on conflict with Germany and we may even very easily. While on the territory of Ukraine and, what the hell, Belarus. And then we’ll see.
The Russian leadership likes to agree with Western partners. So fond that hydroplaned and shifts often loses the sense of reality. Tricky trade-offs and concessions in the Balkans eventually led to the fact that the former Yugoslavia was destroyed and divided. The same thing could happen with the former Soviet Union, and then Russia itself in a never-ending process of bargaining with our valued partners.
But in any case, from a direct conflict between Russia and Germany, Russia and the EU Britain will get only profit and no loss. Therefore, the closer Brakcet, the more intense the attempt to pit the Europeans and Russia. Very British to the conflict will not have a relationship, isn’t it?
Therefore, the report of the Defense Committee of the British Parliament, at the same time calling for sanctions against Russia from the EU and “dialogue” only looks schizophrenic. In fact, the strengthening of sanctions needs to implement the EU to which Britain has now indirectly related. But in the dialogue to join, of course, is very British, which is easy to explain, the true enemies.
In other words, the appeals of the defense Committee of the British Parliament to the extension of EU sanctions against Russia by including in the sanctions list of more representatives of the Russian authorities is quite logical.
The British demand to “serve the renewal of EU sanctions against Russia and to consider their extension at the expense of the wider group of persons from among the leadership of the country” and “to review the effectiveness of the existing policy of containment of hostilities involving nuclear and conventional weapons and attacks from the air, sea and land”.
Britain has no permanent friends but have permanent interests. But do the bloody 20th century has not taught Russia and Germany of anything?
