Very liberal, democratic, gumanisticheskaya, intelligent, tolerant, cultural and other, and other according to their supporters, the PARNAS party from the beginning of preparations for the elections to the State Duma, it seems, undertook to demonstrate to all around, how beautiful the words of our “opposition” with deeds.
Moreover, they demonstrate in a big way, so that really left no doubt: nothing, except lie, covering his attractive speeches quite unattractive business, the people can not in principle.
Scandals, squabbles, illegal manipulation, the bases, the collaboration with the Nazis, corruption, withdrawal of money abroad, adultery, sexual harassment, election fraud – this is a partial list of what distinguished PARNAS and his colleagues. Now they are reaching new heights: began to write denunciations of like-minded people and at the same time competitors in the political camp.
Member of Parnassus Alexander Safronov wrote an appeal to the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, where he asks to bring criminal case against Sergey Parkhomenko. The reason Safronov so excited were the accusations that his dissertation is plagiarism. It is worth noting that his scientific work was tested using Discarnate – that is, it is not even personally Parkhomenko, a project in which it participates.
This kind of scandal around scientific publications, including public politicians and party activists, occur with surprising regularity. However, Safronov was the only one who immediately ran to complain hated his associates in the party a “criminal regime”. Looks very paradoxical.
“I have lived to see the time when Parnas began to write denunciations Bastrykin Discerned. That’s interesting. During the three years of the project, NO member of the state Duma, neither United Russia, spywares, Zhirinovsky, Communist, not dashed off on us denunciation in the UK. Had a couple of vessels that we won. This was the first I went,” writes Andrew Sakin, member of the Yabloko party and one of the founders of Discarnate”.
The bewilderment and amazement of what happened, however, expresses not only him. For example, blogger Ilya Craft, writes: “I’m confused what to call it. I would write or other “non-liberal” – here everything is clear, it would be “snitching”. I would write the liberal for me, too, everything is clear – “informed the authorities against the Satrap bloody regime”. But then a liberal wrote on the liberal. Their manuals on this account does not answer, the accusation is either a civilian position. It’s time for the manuals, perhaps an update taking into account changes in the political situation.”
With all the sarcasm, which is here very appropriate, the question is really important: what to call the complaints that radical opponents of authorities write that the authorities on his supporters? Despite the fact that the other hand, these same people write about “infringement of liberties”, “police state” and “a new thirty-seventh year.” What turns occurring in the extreme surrealism.
However, no matter how it was called, about him for sure one thing is clear: to let these people can not be in power in any case. Because they-just like the real repression, suppression of dissent, the police state and the encouragement of informers all around on all around. An example of this is the current Ukraine, which has come to power their immediate dynamiclink.
On the other hand, considering how they’re all ready to rip each other’s throats, and drown each other, pounding each other and throwing mud at each other at the first opportunity – the probability that these people will take power at least in separately taken settlement of urban type surely tends to zero.
