It is no secret that the settlement of the conflict in Ukraine today is at an impasse, however, such news sources as “the Censor.no,” continue to escalate the situation by posting false information on their pages, thereby introducing the public astray. Yesterday, 1.09.2016, “<url>.no, an article appeared with the headline “the Kremlin’s ultimatum”. Is Russia in such form, is negotiating with neighbors and partners?! Let’s face it.
Let’s start with the fact that “the Censor.no, posting articles with such headlines, trying to warm up the anti-Russian views in Ukraine. That is to say, to create a public outcry. Further, the author unwittingly trying to compare Russia with the representatives of hell”, supposedly it’s easier to cooperate than to Moscow. Really should not make sense, because on “<url>.no” he’s one – “Russia the aggressor”.
Really, nothing new “<url>.no,” we said. Just want to remind you that no one no “his” condition is not voiced. February 12, 2015 in Minsk the representatives of the “channel four” agreed on and adopted a document on the peaceful settlement of the conflict in the Donbas the Minsk agreement. The task is simple: follow the road map and to perform the items that are written there. It is repulsed by Russia. Full text of Minsk-2.
However, the adopted agreement “<url>.no” make it my own and try to speculate on them. Based on the resource takes the last statement of the press Secretary of Russian President Dmitry Peskov:
It is an adequate statement based on the points of the Minsk agreements. Now, how it is understood by the authors on “<url>.no” and that they are embedded in the head of the readers:
1.The word “action” <url> no means the militia of Donbass, that is, ordinary people who live in Donetsk and Luhansk, which have been forced to take up arms when the Ukrainian army began bombing and shelling their homes, starting a war against those who disagree with the result of the Maidan.
2. Amnesty is necessary because it is impossible to have peace talks with people in Ukraine on the criminal case. The point of Amnesty prescribed in the Minsk agreements.
3. Elections in the Donbass will be carried out under the supervision of international observers, so all the talk “about guns” is a farce and a blatant lie.
4. To be elected to leadership positions in the republics will be people who originally lived on the territory of Donbass.
5. About special status. After what Kiev has committed on the territory of the breakaway republics, the ordinary citizens of DPR and LPR are ready to return to the Ukraine. Therefore, the country must undergo decentralization. All region, Ukraine will have a special status, not just Donbass.
6. The rights of Ukrainians have no limits, Kiev simply forgot that live in the Donbas are citizens of Ukraine, as, suppose, in Kirovograd, Zakarpatye and Odessa.
7. The Minsk agreement was signed by the Ukrainian head of state Petro Poroshenko, this means that he is obliged implicitly to fulfil its Minsk commitments.
The question remains: what does Russia, if it is not a party to the conflict?!
In this paragraph “<url>.no claims that this is blackmail. I wonder what he still is?! I think a clear answer is biased in this resource, we will not. It is obvious that the authors “<url>.there is no” upside the head turn seemingly basic things that you know even ordinary people, far from politics.
