Home / Policy / American supporters of the war with Russia temporarily lost

American supporters of the war with Russia temporarily lost

Американские сторонники войны с Россией временно проиграли

 

Russian media wrote a lot about that American “hawks” in Europe was trying to use the Ukrainian crisis to provoke conflict between Russia and NATO. In the West, of course, all these reports at best were ignored, and at worst, announced the Kremlin propaganda or misinformation. And now, two years later, in the public domain appeared pismis hacked electronic mail, General Philip Breedlove, who served as Supreme commander of NATO forces in Europe during a coup in Ukraine. The correspondence confirms that a us General was looking for channels through which it could convince the US administration to start an indirect war with Russia in Ukraine.

Breedlove contacted a former commander of the armed forces of NATO General Wesley Clark, former national security Advisor of the United States and Secretary of state, period prezidenstvovaniya George Bush Sr., General Colin Powell, the former adviser on national security, and today Director of the consulting firm Killowen Group, which advises leaders of government and business by Harlan Ullman, assistant Secretary of state Victoria Nuland and the American Ambassador in Ukraine Jeffrey Paet.

Wesley Clark April 8, 2014 Breedlove sent a message from Anatoly Pinchuk and Dmitry Tymchuk, informal communicators of Ukraine with the military-political establishment of the US. In communication, both Ukrainians claimed that Russia is preparing an invasion of Ukraine and that the troops of the United States or NATO should send its armed forces for the sake of the new government and “conquests” of the revolution. Clark the information came from a former adviser to the NATO Secretary General Philip Curbera. Karber existence of this correspondence was acknowledged and thereby confirmed the reliability of emails from hacked email to General Breedlove.

Harlan Ullman in October 2014 Breedlove advised to refer to the us Vice President Joe Biden, supposedly it’s the best way to convey his proposals for military intervention in Ukraine to the White house and Barack Obama. A month later he also advises Breedlove to contact the EU Ambassador to the US David O’sullivan, and in February 2015, Ullman writes to the General that we need to convince Obama and Kerry in the inevitability of confrontation with Putin.

Американские сторонники войны с Россией временно проигралиPhoto: nato.int

General Philip Breedlove, who tried to involve Russia in the conflict with NATO in Ukraine

But the General Breedlove went a step further in March this year accusing Russia and Syria to use immigration crisis to destabilize Europe. It is not surprising that soon even the Obama administration’s patience, and General Breedlove in his post and was succeeded by General Curtis Scaparotti, which, however, is no less aggressive in relation to Russia.
From the documents we can conclude the existence of a giant rift between the Obama administration and people from the environment of the U.S. armed forces. The existence of conflict within the American political elite, which is not on the party division, in recent years much has been written. But the evidence of such a schism, until recently, was limited to indirect evidence or even declared conspiracy. The first public speech of the leaders of the Pentagon and the CIA against the Russian-American plan to resolve the conflict in Syria, which in February of this year, announced Vladimir Putin and Barack Obama and the subsequent review of the foreign Minister of Russia Sergey Lavrov, nalkowska the challenges to American power vertical.

Hacked correspondence Breedlove translates these assumptions of conspiracy theories in the category of facts lifts the veil on a dual power that prevails in the higher echelons of American politics. For a military confrontation with Russia are the military occupying the hawkish anti-Russian stance, but don’t find this much support from the Obama administration, whose priorities begin to shift towards intra-American Affairs and the rejection of an active foreign policy in favor of development of international consensus. The search of such a consensus should become the main task of Donald trump as the new President of the United States, if, of course, they will be. And Russia in this business for the trump is not the enemy. Because the creation of large international coalitions to address major security issues without Russia is not possible.

Another indication of the political split in the United States may be that last week fell out of favor with George Soros. His supra-national non-profit organization Open Society Foundations is now under intense pressure from critics within the United States. George Soros globalist, until recently, enjoyed the support of the Obama administration. Therefore, the attack on NGOs and his accusation of lack of transparency of funding says about the split of the American national elite and the change of priorities in high offices. A key question remains: who will emerge victorious from this conflict, and what consequences for both the US and the rest of the planet is the result?

So in conclusion, I wonder how will react on the published correspondence of the American General who tried to incite a war in Europe, the Western media? Will I apologize to Russian journalists and news agencies, then wrote dozens of articles about the activity of American generals and diplomats in the Ukraine, for the charges of disinformation and propaganda?

 

Check Also

The UN’s ‘unofficial man’

Raphael Lemkin, a stateless Jewish refugee who died penniless, gave mankind’s greatest crime its name. …